It was never destroyed when the Romans were still in full occupation of Britannia but that's not to say that when the Romans left, they didn't have a go at destroying it. However it is known that during the centuries, stone has been taken from the wall and used to build other structures such as houses, bridges and other walls
no. It's in northumbria
about 500 to 1000 soldiers
The Romans and the Celts fought in Hadrians Wall.
Hadrians wall marks the furthest extent of the Roman conquest of britain(not counting the antonine wall)
Hadrians wall
Hadrians wall is in Rome and It was built by the sevants of King Hadrian. And they found timber by it.
It was the least important wall
The Amazon River is much longer. Hadrians Wall, in England, is much shorter.
hadrians wall
no. It's in northumbria
because the Hadrian's wall is crumbled
Now Hadrian's wall is British, but originally it was Roman.
there was 16 forts.
None. It is not a brick wall. It was constructed of stone and turf.
about 500 to 1000 soldiers
None. It is entirely in England.
The Romans and the Celts fought in Hadrians Wall.