Undoubtedly, several were, but John 1:35+40 only mentions Andrew by name. John the baptizer was sent specifically to prepare the way for the Messiah(Isaiah 40:3/Malachi 3:1/Matthew 11:10), so this transfer of discipleship was expected and encouraged(Acts 19:4 / John 3:26-30 /Matthew 3:7-12)
Yes he was thebrother and wanted to know Jesus better so he became a disciple.
No John was a brother of James the son of Zebedee.
St. Thomas was a disciple of Jesus and an apostle. Before becoming a disciple, he was a fisherman.
The apostle called the beloved disciple by Jesus was the disciple John, who was the youngest of all the disciples. And also died last , as ,many were killed. before theoir time John sat with Jesus on the table next to Jesus.
Apostle
Simeon was a disciple, not an apostle. The apostles were specifically chosen by Jesus as his closest followers and given the authority to preach the gospel. Disciples, on the other hand, were more general followers of Jesus.
Thaddeus was Jesus' tenth disciple.
Saint Augustine was a disciple in the sense he was a follower of Christ but he was not a disciple or apostle called by Jesus himself.
John the disciple was banished to the isle of Patmos.
Judas was the disciple who betrayed him for 30 pieces of silver.
The Apostle Peter was the chief Administrator for the others and the new movement.
The Apostle Saint Matthew was Jewish, a native of Israel. He was a tax collector by trade before meeting Jesus and becoming his disciple.
Saint John the Apostle was the person appointed by Our Lord to care for his mother.
Neither, John the baptist was a prophet. He was the cousin of Jesus. He started preaching and baptizing shortly before the start of the ministry of Jesus of Nazareth and thus was neither a disciple nor an apostle. He is indicated in the Bible as the forerunner of Jesus. See Matthew 3:1ff, Mark 1:1ff, Luke 1:ff, Luke 3:1ff, John 1:19ff for biblical references to John the baptist.