In few was Charles was a good king because mainly he was a bad king. The king was more to blame due to his greed and arrogance. He could not efficiently handle money which is the reason why he barely had any and always tried to force Parliament to hand some over, he attempted ship money which made those who lived on the coast pay extra taxes to support the navy but later was enforced on all the citizens of England. The shutting down of Parliament for a brief moment does not help his case either. Through this, the King lost many natural supporters of the monarchy and military which aided the Parliament in becoming more powerful than the monarchy.
no
No, he was a Radical Republican senator from Massachusetts.
Charles de Gaulle
they had a better leader at the time and had more and advanced military weapons.
Strong military, good government and leader, and power
The term supreme leader is most likely to be used in a military dictatorship. Kim Jong Il of North Korea would be a good example of a supreme leader.
Charles cornwallis
No, he was a Radical Republican senator from Massachusetts.
Charles de Gaulle
he was the biggest idiot
no he was not people hated him
Charles Martel, also known as Charles the Hammer, is believed to have had a minimal formal education. However, he received training in military tactics and leadership skills from his father, Pepin of Herstal. Despite his lack of formal education, Charles Martel became a renowned military leader and ruled as the de facto ruler of the Franks.
If you mean Charles Manson then yes, he is (was) a cult leader.
snowball is a dedicated leader as well as a good military leader, later on in the story snowball is criticised of being a traitor by napoleon.
Good old George Washington
they had a better leader at the time and had more and advanced military weapons.
communist military leader Mathieu Kerekou from 1972-1991.
The Muslim military leader who led an attack against the Christians was _______.