He could be called a good man who did bad things. ''Or:'' He could be called a bad man who did good things. ''Or even:'' Sometimes what appears to be good or bad to one individual is not viewed in the same manner by others. Or in other words He is just a bad bad bad bad bad dude.
Yes and No. He tried to bring glory to France, but he could not do that without using his experience from the Military.
Some say that he was a good man who sometimes did bad things.
He provided a better government then was available under the Monarchy or the Republic and despite his numerous errors and failures, he was both a charismatic and respected head of state.
Technically yes but I'm not telling you why...
His rule was generally beneficial and progressive (Call it people friendly.)
No, he may have done things that were inherently evil, but that does not make him evil personified.
No, but he was tough and manly.
No, he was a good leader who sometimes did bad things.
By this i assume you mean the book animal farm. This depends on perspective, Napoleon (the pig) is portrayed to be bad and mean therefore this was a bad thing. However Napoleon will have seen it as a good thing.
Napoleon is one of the finest military Commanders in History. Following the Revoultion & the Reign of Terror Napoleon is given command of the Army of Italy, against the Austrians. his campaining is brilliant & his rise meteoric. The Code Napoleon to this day forms much of the basis of Law in France: As an administrator Napoleon is phenominal. As time passes the defeats in Russia, at Leipzig & finally at Waterloo end his reign. It is undoubted that Napoleon changes France out of all recognition, despite the failings that Napoleon had, in terms of the French & France, Napoleon Bonaparte was very good indeed. Bad, to some people for the fact that he conquered the countries. He was also a great leader which is how we remember him today.
our Leader, Comrade Napoleon
Yes, Napoleon Bonaparte was an important leader in France.
No, he was a good leader who sometimes did bad things.
napoleon bnaparte is a good man, he helped people who were starving and he was also a very good leader. most of the people liked him.
By this i assume you mean the book animal farm. This depends on perspective, Napoleon (the pig) is portrayed to be bad and mean therefore this was a bad thing. However Napoleon will have seen it as a good thing.
both
our Leader, Comrade Napoleon
Yes, Napoleon Bonaparte was an important leader in France.
Napoleon is one of the finest military Commanders in History. Following the Revoultion & the Reign of Terror Napoleon is given command of the Army of Italy, against the Austrians. his campaining is brilliant & his rise meteoric. The Code Napoleon to this day forms much of the basis of Law in France: As an administrator Napoleon is phenominal. As time passes the defeats in Russia, at Leipzig & finally at Waterloo end his reign. It is undoubted that Napoleon changes France out of all recognition, despite the failings that Napoleon had, in terms of the French & France, Napoleon Bonaparte was very good indeed. Bad, to some people for the fact that he conquered the countries. He was also a great leader which is how we remember him today.
Napoleon Bonaparte was a great leader and ran his country under a code
He is honored at Les Invalides.
snowball is a dedicated leader as well as a good military leader, later on in the story snowball is criticised of being a traitor by napoleon.
Napoleon was a good country loyalist but ruthless leader, Grande Armée was the name given to the rank.
no.