0
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
To an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoTo an extent, yes, as he was a gritty, tough military leader. However in his political aspects he falls short. Sulla tried to bring back the ideals of the republic, but his methods were brutal. A good leader perhaps could have instigated reforms without the bloodshed and proscriptions that Sulla initiated. Whether he was good or bad is a question that can be debated forever.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When did pompey conquer Jerusalem?
They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.
What military leader marched his troops into the city of Rome first?
The first military leader to march his troops into the city of Rome was Lucius Cornelius Sulla. This happened in 88 BC during a dispute between the leaders of Rome's two rival political factions, Sulla and Marius. The dispute escalated into a military conflict which historians have called Sulla's First Civil War.
Which of man was NOT part of the triumvirate that ruled the Roman Empire in 60 BC?
Sulla Hope it helped! -Blue
What roman leader was assassinated on March 15 44 BC?
Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.Julius Caesar was the Roman leader who was assassinated on March 15th.
How do you think Marius and sulla influenced later roman leadersLucius Cornelius Sulla?
Gaius Marius was the leader of the populares, a political faction which championed the cause of the poor and wanted reforms to help the poor. Sulla was the leader of the optimates, a political faction which supported the interests of the aristocracy and was opposed to the reform. Marius became a heroic figure for later optimates and a model. When Sulla defeated Marius in his two civil wars against Marius he was appointed as dictator. This term had a different meaning for the Romans. The dictator was an extraordinary officer of state who was appointed at times of emergency with a term of six months. For Sulla, however, no time limit was given. He was given the task of reforming the Roman constitution and resigned after one year. During his dictatorship, Sulla persecuted his political enemies and executed thousands of them. This gave the office of the dictatorship a bad name and was seen as an example not to be repeated. It is thought that this influenced Caesar's famous leniency towards his enemies. During the Great Civil War which Caesar fought against the forces of the senate and the optimates, Caesar was in the habit of pardoning his enemies after victory. Caesar was eighteen during Sulla's persecutions. Sulla stripped Caesar of the priesthood he held at the time, his inheritance and dowry and wanted to force him to divorce his wife. Caesar fled Rome and returned only after Sulla's death. Therefore, it is thought that these events were the root of Caesar's clemency.
Who was consul sulla?
An ancient Roman military leader, Lucius Cornelius Sulla.
Who was consuls?
An ancient Roman military leader, Lucius Cornelius Sulla.
What year did the Roman leader Sulla set out to battle with Mithridates?
86 BCE.
Who did Sulla fight for?
Sulla was a military and political leader who fought for Rome.
What did Sulla do for a living?
Sulla was a military and political leader during the Roman Republic. He first came to prominence during the Jugurthine War, when he served under Marius. Successful military campaigns provided huge incomes for their commanders.
How do you pronounce Sulla the Roman general?
Soo-lah.
What is assciated with the word sulla?
The word Sulla is associated with a Roman general and conservative statesman. Sulla was awarded the grass crown which is a very rare and prestigious military honor.
Why was it important for Roman leader Sulla to defeat Mithridates?
Mithridates of Pontus was enlisting and organising resistance of the Greek peoples against Roman expansion in the east. This began with the slaughter of local Romans which forced wavering Greek cities to take sides. With this combined threat, Sulla had to defeat Pontus and its allies or face permanent loss of its gains in the east.
Did marist start a civil war against sulla?
No, the Civil war with Sulla was fought between Sulla and Marius. Marius and Sulla battled for control of Rome, and after Marius' death, Sulla marched on Rome, and proclaimed himself dictator, in which he led a slaughter on the Roman peoples.
When did pompey conquer Jerusalem?
They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.They didn't. Greece was Roman territory long before Caesar and Pompey became prominent. It was Sulla that put the finishing touches on the Roman conquest of Greece.
Dictator of the Roman Republic after the first civil war?
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
How do you think Marius and Sulla influenced later leader?
Marius was a leader of the populares, a political faction which championed the cause of the poor. He influenced later populares politicians, including Julius Caesar. Sulla was a leader of the rival optimates, a conservative political faction which supported the interests of the aristocracy. He influenced later optimates politicians. However, this was tempered by the fact that Sulla executed thousands of his political opponents.
