Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar (1556-1605), popularly known as Akbar the Great, was the son and successor of Humayun.
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
Akbar is known as a successful ruler due to his visionary policies that emphasized religious tolerance, administrative reforms, and cultural integration. He established the Din-i Ilahi, promoting dialogue among different faiths, and implemented a centralized administrative system that improved governance and revenue collection. His patronage of the arts and architecture led to a flourishing of culture, exemplified by the construction of Fatehpur Sikri. Overall, his ability to unify a diverse empire and foster a sense of inclusivity contributed significantly to his legacy.
humayun
akbar
akbar
Akbar was a successful ruler as most of the subcontinents population was Hindu, he changed Islamic religion policies and was more influenced by Hinduism and even married many Hindu women. A+ all of the answers are correct
King Akbar also called Akbar the Great was the 3rd Mughal Emperor. He is known as the greatest ruler of the Mughal Dynasty.
Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar (1556-1605), popularly known as Akbar the Great, was the son and successor of Humayun.
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
Akbar is known as a successful ruler due to his visionary policies that emphasized religious tolerance, administrative reforms, and cultural integration. He established the Din-i Ilahi, promoting dialogue among different faiths, and implemented a centralized administrative system that improved governance and revenue collection. His patronage of the arts and architecture led to a flourishing of culture, exemplified by the construction of Fatehpur Sikri. Overall, his ability to unify a diverse empire and foster a sense of inclusivity contributed significantly to his legacy.
Akbar
humayun
His eldest son Jahangir succeeded Akbar (1605-1627).
akbar
akbar the great
akbar