Want this question answered?
No, an absolute monarchy is when a hereditary ruler makes all of the decisions for a nation. The ruler is given the throne by it being passed down through a family. These governments are nearly obsolete nowadays.
Which revolution? They had an absolute monarchy, then a limited monarchy, then a Republic, then a Directorate, then a Consulate, then an Empire, then a limited monarchy, then the Empire again for three months, then the limited monarchy again, then an absolute monarchy, then a constitutional monarchy with a King from a different family, then a second Republic, then the Empire back again, then the Third Republic, then (during WW2) a puppet dictatorship, then a Fourth Republic, then a Fifth. Who knows if that's the end of the stoiry?
A form of dictatorship is similar to an absolute monarchy. The key difference is the manner by which a new "king or dictator" is selected. The monarchy is based on family ties, while a dictatorship relies on a powerful member of the single party nation to succeed the last dictator.
Although Brunei is technically a constitutional monarchy, the Sultan is given full executive power and his role as ruler of the nation is enshrined in the country's constitution, so it effectively functions as an absolute monarchy. Moreover, the ruling royal family is highly respected, and subsequent rulers are selected following traditional rites of succession.
It passes from reigning monarch to legitimate heir when the reigning monarch dies or abdicates. The specifics of what defines a legitimate heir depends on the absolute monarchy. In some monarchies, the family member must be male -- but in others it can be female. In some monarchies, it must be a child of the current monarch -- but in others it can be a sibling. In some monarchies, if there is no immediate family, a new royal family is sought -- but in others, a more distant family member is sought.
Absolute monarchy requires there to be a hereditary leadership that has complete control over the domestic situation of his country without the impediment of any other branch of government or citizens' rights. The Saudi government follows those exact parameters in that: the power rests exclusively in the Saud family hands with all of the government ministers being family members, there are no documents abridging royal authority in domestic affairs, there is no external branch of government to the royal family, and nobody can petition the government for changes.
1. In an absolute monarchy only the people selected by the ruler are allowed to participate in the government. 2. In an absolute monarchy one person, the ruler, has the power to make decisions. 3. Majority rules does not exist in an absolute monarchy. Minority rule and one-person rule exist in an absolute monarchy. (I COPIED THIS FROM MY TEXTBOOK)
A country run by a royal family would be described as a monarchy.
A Monarchy gets their power by being born into a ruling family .
They have a king, Juan Carlos.
Before the Revoultion, France was an Absolute Monarchy. The King ruled by Divine Right, and his command was law. There were a number of feudal institutions that had roles in the enforcement and overseeing of laws, such as the law courts known as the Parlements. But the King had the final right to enforce or overturn any law. He could imprison people at will and hold them without charge. He had the right to confer property and titles of nobility, and to take them away. The King and his Ministers ruled France directly. Nobles and the Catholic Church also had numerous traditional rights, such as the rights to collect certain levies from the people.
A kingdom is amassed lands. The Monarchy is the royal family of the kingdom.