Embryonic stem cells are useful in medical research because it is the most primary form of stem cells and thus it can be easily developed into almost endless types of cells.
The "soon will" is an absolute lie...not a misstatement, not misinformation, but a pure lie. Embryonic stem cells will NEVER be approved because of things we are not allowed to hear
in the USA: 1--They cause cancer, as proven by the deaths of tens of thousands of lab animals around the world over the past decade. 2--The cost of a pure embryonic stem cell treatment for ANY disease would be 10-15 times the cost of adult stem cell treatments. 3--For those intentionally blind who think either of these two is not correct, ask your expert why the US govt clinical trial website lists well over 2000 completed and successful adult stem cell clinical trials and zero embryonic trials even started! See what story he comes up with.
Human embryonic and adult stem cells each have advantages and disadvantages regarding potential use for cell-based regenerative therapies. ... Adult stem cells are thought to be limited to differentiating into different cell types of their tissue of origin. Embryonic stem cells can be grown relatively easily in culture.
Stem cell can grow and develop into different organs and body tissues.
Sometimes there are similarities in the embryonic stages of organisms that don't exist in the adult stages.
The radicle becomes root, the hypotocyl becomes the stem and plumule develops in to leaves and stem branches etc.
Yes. Embryonic stem cells are controversial due to the destruction needed of a fetus. The debate over this is whether the unborn child has a right to life. (Embyonic stem cell debate). However, there are adult stem cells that come from adults. Scientists have been able to get these adult stem to replicate embryonic stem cell properties, and depending on who you ask, the adult stem cells have proven more useful than embryonic stem cells. Since adult stem cells do not destroy anybody, there is nearly non-existant debate with this.
An embryonic stem cell potentially can develop into ANY cell in the body theoretically without limit to replenish, and an adult stem cell is only able to mature into a specialised tissue cell from which tissue the cell is positioned.
Second answer:The question of what is "right" depends on your personal values. My own value system says adult stem cell research is "right" while embryonic stem cell research as it has been performed thus far is "wrong." It is wrong because it is funded by tax dollars, has produced no tangible results, and it requires the taking of a human life to perform. 60 years ago, the Nazi government researcher Dr. Joseph Mengele was put on trial and convicted for performing forced experiments on human subjects many of whom died in the experiment.Several see embryonic stem cell research in a similar light. It is performed using subjects that did not volunteer, all of the subjects whose stem cells are harvested die, and it requires government funding. My own view is tempered a bit. I believe embryonic stem cell research could be justified if it was the only way such research could occur and if it showed promise. It is not the only way to perform such research and it does not show promise.Thus far, embryonic stem cell research has cost billions, resulted in the indictment of Korean researcher Hwang Woo-Suki and his research team on fraud and embezzlement charges, and produced no tangible results while requiring the taking of a human life to perform. Yet it is still being funded by the US government and a few state governments.On the other hand adult bone marrow stem cell research, while still experimental, has produced several cures including the first patient considered to be "cured" of AIDS. The experimental cures range from blood cancers to bone disease. This research has been accomplished largely with private research funds and does not require the taking of a human life and in fact can be performed with a patient's own stem cells.In 2008, adult stem cells were used to grow a section of a human trachea which was transplanted in the stem cell donor's body with success.
Human embryonic and adult stem cells each have advantages and disadvantages regarding potential use for cell-based regenerative therapies. ... Adult stem cells are thought to be limited to differentiating into different cell types of their tissue of origin. Embryonic stem cells can be grown relatively easily in culture.
Human embryonic and adult stem cells each have advantages and disadvantages regarding potential use for cell-based regenerative therapies. ... Adult stem cells are thought to be limited to differentiating into different cell types of their tissue of origin. Embryonic stem cells can be grown relatively easily in culture.
Present research indicates that adult stem cells are just as good as embryonic.
One reason researchers prefer to use embryonic stem cells instead of adult stem cells because adult stem cells are often found in limited quantities, are difficult to isolate, and the older the donor, the less stem cells they have.
embryonic stem cells can differentiate into more types of cells
One major difference between adult and embryonic stem cells is their different abilities in the number and type of differentiated cell types they can become. Embryonic stem cell can become all cell types of the body because they are pluripotent. Adult stem cells are thought to be limited to differentiating into different cell types of their tissue of origin.
They are not better, embryonic stem cells can become more types then adult.
The main similarity between embryonic and adult stem cells is their ability for self-renewal.
adult body cells have a function where as embryonic stem cells have no set function as of that stage. now there are some adult stem cells and those have little to no difference than embryonic stem cells
adult body cells have a function where as embryonic stem cells have no set function as of that stage. now there are some adult stem cells and those have little to no difference than embryonic stem cells
Catholics are COMPLETELY against stem cell research. Another Answer Catholics are completely against embryonic stem cell research, which is completely immoral because it involves harvesting and destroying human embryos - infants. Catholics support adult stem cell research, and Catholic physicians and geneticists are carrying it on right now. "Adult" this case is a term that means "already born". The source of these cells is often blood from newborn infants' placentas and umbilical cords, these used to be just thrown away as medical waste. This blood and tissue provides "adult" stem cells that can be used for this research. In fact, the most successful results transplanting stem cells have been of the "adult" type; none of the "embryonic" type has yet been successful.
Adult stem cells are more specalized than their embryonic counterparts, embryonic stem cells can become any cell whereas adult stem cells can only be used to form certain cells.