What animal would not get on noahs ark?

Answer 1

*makes a really weird thinking face* Probably a snake, but in the bible it says that 2 of every animal got on. -Whitney Leland

According to most Creationist Theologists, Noah did not take any fish, or other marine life, on the ark, so every species of fish, mollusk or crustacean observable today had to survive out in the open ocean for the entire duration of the flood. However, this would have presented numerous insurmountable problems. The mixing of salt and fresh water would have killed many fish, tremendous oceanic turbulence (in the creation of worldwide high-speed currents) would have killed others, coral reefs survive because of their shallow waters and clear light which would end, the topsoil of the land would have eroded making the water very murkey, and still others would be thrown out of their normal habitat would die of starvation.

Answer 2

Well, isn't that a fun thought! You know, Noah's Ark was a special place for all creatures big and small. But if I had to guess, maybe animals that live in the water, like fish or whales, wouldn't need to be on the ark because they were already right at home in their own little paradise. Nature has a way of taking care of all its creatures, don't you think?

Answer 3

The Bible says very clearly that the animals came to the arc of Noah , two by two. And Noah did not take any animal inside himself.

Answer 4

snake

Answer 5

Since 1656 years had transpired from Adam to the flood, it is likely that within this time frame a large number of species have already become extinct, due to the fact that violence filled the earth. Of those that remained, two of each species, male and female, and seven pairs of each species of "clean" animals and birds that were not extinct were on the ark.