# parties may argue against each other without the regard for the truth, because the pursuit of winning often overshadows the search for truth and thus and parties are sometimes inclined to ignore the truth. # since jury's trial is part of the system, some disadvantages of jury trail also belong to adversary system, such as the delays in cases coming to the court or the postponement of the cases. This is a flaw in the system as lengthy in cases coming to court find the victims have trouble remembering every detail of their ordeals. # trial can be delayed, prolonged and costly # it's may become winning the case more important than the truth.
Adversarial system.
the adversarial system
Adversarial system.
Adversarial system.
Adversarial system
That describes the adversarial system perfectly. There are winners and there are losers - that is the way the system is designed. Anything else would be called 'mediation' or 'arbitration.'
An advantage of the adversary system is that evidence from both parties are heard before a judge comments. However, the disadvantage is that both parties evidence rests on the resources both parties have and may be unequal.
They are known as the defendant.
the United States; English
yes
The Australian justice system is an adversarial system of justice where there are essentially two parties that face each other in court proceedings. So the answer of your question could best be described as an Adversarial Trial.
In criminal court you have two sides advocating for their particular party. The prosecutor arguing for the state, and the defense arguing for the defendant. They are adversaries. Thus, an adversarial system, not a cooperative system.