The word "props" is short for "properties" and means any moveable thing which can be moved onto or carried onto the stage. This includes set props like tables, beds and benches, and hand props like swords, rings, candlesticks, letters and so on. Shakespeare did not own any props: the company he worked for (and which he was a shareholder in) did have all of the above props and many more.
Yes they did. They used a range of props from big props (ie. beds and cannons which were left on the stage) to smaller props (like daggers and swords).
Props in sixteenth-century productions were just like props of today. If they needed swords, they had swords. If they needed drinking glasses, they had drinking glasses. They had a skull for Hamlet, a handkerchief for Othello, and a ring for Viola. They did not go in for unnecessary props, props just to decorate the stage. Although Tree insisted on real rabbits to decorate the stage in Midsummer Night's Dream, Shakespeare assuredly did not.
Yes they did! they used meant otherwise it would not be a play.
I am a Ballet Dancer and yes we do use props but not like big heavy ones more like ribbons and things of that sort.
The various actors in the company owned shares in all of the company's assets (primarily scripts, props and costumes). It is believed that Shakespeare had a one-twelfth interest.
Yes they did. They used a range of props from big props (ie. beds and cannons which were left on the stage) to smaller props (like daggers and swords).
Props in sixteenth-century productions were just like props of today. If they needed swords, they had swords. If they needed drinking glasses, they had drinking glasses. They had a skull for Hamlet, a handkerchief for Othello, and a ring for Viola. They did not go in for unnecessary props, props just to decorate the stage. Although Tree insisted on real rabbits to decorate the stage in Midsummer Night's Dream, Shakespeare assuredly did not.
The word "props" is short for "properties". Properties is an old word--Shakespeare uses it in A Midsummer Night's Dream with the same meaning.
Yes they did! they used meant otherwise it would not be a play.
a mug, some papers and maybe like some sort of blazer
I am a Ballet Dancer and yes we do use props but not like big heavy ones more like ribbons and things of that sort.
The various actors in the company owned shares in all of the company's assets (primarily scripts, props and costumes). It is believed that Shakespeare had a one-twelfth interest.
in Romeo and Juliet, he used empty bottles and maybe toy daggers!
The word "props" is an abbreviation of "properties". Shakespeare uses "properties" in exactly this sense in A Midsummer Night's Dream when Peter Quince says, "In the meantime I will draw a bill of properties, such as our play wants." Shakespeare also uses "props" in its meaning as "things which hold something up." He uses this more proper meaning of prop quite often, and the plural twice. For example, Shylock says "You take my house when you do take the prop That doth sustain my house; you take my life When you do take the means whereby I live." Another word for this would be "support" but Shakespeare only uses the noun form of support once.
No, Shakespeare wrote plays. Other people decided to sort them into genres.
Shakespeare invested his money in his playing company, which owned theatres, costumes, props and other valuables. He also loaned money to others. He bought a large and valuable house in his hometown of Stratford.
Well, I'm sure you can think of some of them, like swords and daggers and drinking glasses and bottles of poison and crowns. There are also a number of notes and letters. Occasionally there are interesting props required like a couple of human skulls, or a donkey's head, or a whetstone, or an overdone roast beef. The props are often implied by the stage directions or even the dialogue. Shakespeare did not compile a proplist for the plays; he expected the director to do that. So it is difficult to be precise about how many of them may be needed.