Video monitors do not emit a radiation known to affect pregnancy.
Yes, flat monitors are completely safe to use. They tend to give off more heat than the tube monitors, however. But there are no indications that they are not safe to use in a household environment.
Thats fine. Laptops generally have LCD screens, which don't release any radiation. You're thinking of cathode ray monitors (the old big huge thick monitors). They release a small amount of radiation out the back. -DJ Craig
The radiation from monitors can certainly affect living organisms; the light can damage the human eye after very short periods. Cell phones and electric power lines have such weak fields that they could not possibly harm a living being. Microwave ovens use shielding and failsafe systems to prevent any radiation affecting anything outside themselves.
LCD monitors are a cheap technology that present a pretty decent picture and can achieve a decently high resolution, while LEDs are more expensive with a better picture, and CRTs give off radiation and can't achieve a very high resolution. LCDs are very favorable monitors for their price, and decent picture quality.
TFT monitors are smaller sized therefore consume less space. There is less glare produced and radiation is much less compared to CRT Monitors.
There are: CRT monitors (those fat monitors) and LCD monitors (flat screens)
The amount of radiation that a heart monitor would put off would be so minimal that it is very unlikely that it would cause radiation poisoning. You would probably have to wear / be exposed to it 24 hours a day for years on end for there to be a noticeable reaction. http://www.cyclingforums.com/forum/thread/226852/is-there-a-danger-of-radiation-from-a-heart-rate-monitor-s-transmitter
No but there is in LCD monitors.
computer monitors
16 monitors !!
Some of the older monitors that use a cathode ray tube could emit very small amounts of x-rays. Regulations for television sets limited that radiation to less than 0.5 mR/h, or about 4.5 uGy/h. Since 2007, most CRTs are well below that limit.