There are no risks, as such. The point of object-oriented programming is to reduce the risks of invalidating data unintentionally. With a well-designed class system, there should be no risk whatsoever. With a badly-designed class system, the risks are as a great as those with structured or procedural programming.
What is object-oriented systems development
What is object-oriented systems development
Mohamed Fayad has written: 'Transition to object-oriented software development' -- subject(s): Development, Object-oriented programming (Computer science), Computer software
Rainer Weinreich has written: 'Concepts and techniques for object-oriented software development' -- subject(s): Development, Object-oriented programming (Computer science), Computer software
David A. Taylor has written: 'Object-oriented technology' -- subject(s): Database design, Object-oriented databases, Development, Computer software 'Object-oriented information systems' -- subject(s): Management information systems, Object-oriented databases, System design
Bertrand Meyer has written: 'Object-Oriented Software Construction' 'Bertrand Meyer's .NET Training Course' 'Object-oriented software construction' -- subject(s): Development, Object-oriented programming (Computer science), Computer software
Lee Atchison has written: 'Object-oriented test & measurement software development in C++' -- subject(s): Development, C++ (Computer program language), Object-oriented methods (Computer science), Computer software
No. C is not object oriented. C++ is object oriented.
The object concept is visual basic net is a part from a book. There are four key concepts of object-oriented development.
Conventional testing is the traditional approach to testing mostly done when water fall life cycle is used for development, while object oriented testing is used when object oriented analysis and design is used for developing enterprise software. Conventional testing focuses more on decomposition and functional approaches as opposed to object oriented testing, which uses composition. The three levels of testing (system, integration, unit) used in conventional testing is not clearly defined when it comes to object oriented testing. The main reason for this is that OO development uses incremental approach, while traditional development follows a sequential approach. In terms of unit testing, object oriented testing looks at much smaller units compared to conventional testing.
Conventional testing is the traditional approach to testing mostly done when water fall life cycle is used for development, while object oriented testing is used when object oriented analysis and design is used for developing enterprise software. Conventional testing focuses more on decomposition and functional approaches as opposed to object oriented testing, which uses composition. The three levels of testing (system, integration, unit) used in conventional testing is not clearly defined when it comes to object oriented testing. The main reason for this is that OO development uses incremental approach, while traditional development follows a sequential approach. In terms of unit testing, object oriented testing looks at much smaller units compared to conventional testing
Richard W. Koontz has written: 'Object-oriented systems development' -- subject(s): Industrial management, Computer simulation, Object-oriented programming (Computer science)