The supporters of an American empire thought annexing the Philippines would provide economic and military benefits. It would provide the U.S. with a naval base in Asia, and a large market for American goods. They also believed that America had the duty to teach "less civilized" people how to live properly. Those who didn't support annexation thought that the cost to run an empire would outweigh the economic benefits that it provided. They also believed that imperialism violated American principles.
You need to answer this question because we don't do homework. You have the item you read and we don't.
Beveridge was for Imperialism while Twain was against imperialism
Beveridge was for Imperialism, while Twain was against imperialism.
ummm so like ask that question more clearly and it shall be answered word of the wise
The league argued that Imperialism went against American principles
He was against imperialism. He lead a revolution for the Latin Americans. He fought against it.
the league argued that Imperialism went against American principles.
The league argued that Imperialism went against American principles
Admiral Mahan's arguments were that our growing production needs this, we need ways to respond quickly, and that we need to be closer. :)
against: -to annex colonies would violate the "consent of the governed" philosophy in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. -Despotism abroad might well beget despotism at home. -Imperialism was costly and was unlikely to turn into a profit. -annexation would propel the U.S. into the political and military cauldron of East Asia. For: -played possible trade profits. -"civilizing mission"
She was against it.
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?