Sustainability refers to a human economy and society whose cumulative effects do not crash the biosphere-the planet's life support "operating" system and primary economy, that is, do not violate the ecological integrity of the biosphere.
Sustainable development refers to the economic and societal development path to get from the unsustainable human economy we have now to ultimate sustainability.
Although it is possible to imagine a sustainable economy that does not respect human rights, it is unlikely that a sustainable society could be based on any structural and systematic violation of human rights.
In addition, many instances of unsustainable practices are driven, in the first instance, by human rights violations, that is barriers to people meeting their human needs or otherwise degrading peoples' health and well-being.
It is also unlikely that the society that would perpetuate structural and systematic human rights violations could conceive of the threats and challenges of sustainability in a way sufficient for generating a development path to sustainability success.
Sustainable development and sustainability will require both tapping the collective intelligence of all people, cultures, and ethnicity and their transformation for sustainability. This is impossible without the condition of human rights for all.
In fact, it could be summarized that as ecological integrity is the cornerstone of a sustainable economy, human-rights integrity is the cornerstone of a sustainable society served by that sustainable economy.
Thus, human rights can be seen as the social dimension and integral component of the ecologic-economic integrity required for sustainable development and ultimate sustainability.
It is the socialist term, sustainable development. Sustainable development sacrifices the private property rights of persons to the felt needs of the collective. By presenting the loss of property rights in a supposedly altruistic setting, those rights are slowly eaten away. Sustainability has been the slow encroachment of liberty as socialism has grown by hiding its true goals.
It is the socialist term, sustainable development. Sustainable development sacrifices the private property rights of persons to the felt needs of the collective. By presenting the loss of property rights in a supposedly altruistic setting, those rights are slowly eaten away. Sustainability has been the slow encroachment of liberty as socialism has grown by hiding its true goals.
There is a difference
Rights refer to the entitlements or freedoms granted to individuals, whereas responsibilities are duties or obligations that individuals are expected to fulfill. Rights are protected by law and ensure that citizens are treated fairly, while responsibilities promote citizenship, social harmony, and contribute to the greater good of society. Rights are centered on personal well-being and individual freedoms, whereas responsibilities are focused on contributing positively to the community and adhering to societal norms.
John C. Redfern has written: 'The new wave millennium, rural economies & human rights' -- subject(s): Human rights, Rural conditions, Rural development, Sustainable development 'The new wave and human rights of constitutional law against the dark age in America' -- subject(s): Civil rights, Secularism
There is a small difference between rights and public issues is simple. Rights involve the individual or small group and public generally involves the whole.
Civil rights refer to the basic rights and freedoms that protect individuals from discrimination based on characteristics like race, gender, or religion. Political rights, on the other hand, relate to participation in the political process, such as the right to vote or run for office. In essence, civil rights guarantee equality and protection under the law, while political rights enable individuals to have a voice in shaping that law.
Nothing they are the same.
power is full of authority while rights is just an access to inter in
Metics were foreign residents in ancient Greek city-states who were free individuals with limited rights and protections, while slaves were individuals who were considered property and had no rights or legal status. Metics could engage in trade and pay taxes, while slaves were owned by others and performed labor or services under coercion.
im wondering the same thing buddy
Statutory rights are rights that are established by laws or statutes, such as labor laws or consumer protection laws. Non-statutory rights are rights that are not specifically defined by law but may arise from common law principles or agreements between parties. The main difference is that statutory rights are clearly defined by written laws, whereas non-statutory rights rely on other sources for recognition and enforcement.