If the theory supports the nature side of the debate then it ignores environmental influences, whereas it it supports the nurture side it takes into account all environmental factors - such as surroundings, upbringing, authority etc
Environmental influences in the nature versus nurture debate refer to factors such as upbringing, education, exposure to toxins, socio-economic status, and cultural experiences that can shape an individual's development and behavior. These external factors interact with genetic predispositions to influence traits and characteristics. Understanding the role of the environment is crucial in determining the relative contributions of nature and nurture to an individual's development.
This debate concerns with what determines any single individual: either inborn abilities or education. However to be taught used in wider sense than to be educated. One can be taught without any education. Thus animals are taught, too.
in the nature v nurture debate what are the enviromental influences
zxCasdsdfasdfsdfasdfasdasdaas
Nature vs. nurture is the debate that examines the impact of genetics (nature) and environmental factors (nurture) on an individual's development and behavior. It considers the interplay between inherent traits and external influences in shaping an individual's characteristics.
nature versus nurture. Nature refers to biological factors such as genetics and hormones, while nurture encompasses environmental and social influences. The debate centers on the relative importance of these factors in shaping psychological differences between men and women.
Both nature and nurture play a role in shaping human behavior and development. Nature refers to genetics and biological factors, while nurture encompasses environmental influences, such as upbringing and social interactions. The debate centers on the relative contributions of both factors in shaping an individual's characteristics and behaviors.
Nature versus nurture can also be known as the debate between genetics and environment in shaping human behavior and traits. It refers to the ongoing discussion about the relative influences of inherited factors (nature) versus environmental factors (nurture) in determining individual characteristics.
Nature vs. nurture is a long-standing debate in psychology that focuses on the relative importance of genetic inheritance (nature) and environmental influences (nurture) in shaping human behavior and development. It examines how genetics and upbringing interact to influence psychological traits and behaviors.
Nature vs. nurture is the debate that examines the impact of genetics (nature) and environmental factors (nurture) on an individual's development and behavior. It considers the interplay between inherent traits and external influences in shaping an individual's characteristics.
The argument of nature vs nurture revolves around the debate of whether a person's traits and behavior are predominantly influenced by genetic factors (nature) or environmental factors (nurture). It questions the extent to which genetics and upbringing shape an individual's characteristics and development. Both nature and nurture play significant roles in shaping human behavior and are intertwined in complex ways.
It is the question whether personality is determined by nature, as in your genes, or nurture, the environment that you grew up in.The nature versus nurture debate, is a debate concerning the importance and influence that genetic make-up has on an individual versus the experiences they have involving their family, education, etcetera, and how these influences impact that person.
The nature vs. nurture debate examines the relative contributions of genetics (nature) and environment (nurture) to human development and behavior. While both play a role, current research suggests that they interact in complex ways to shape an individual's traits and characteristics. The consensus is that both nature and nurture are important factors in shaping human behavior and development.
Nature and nurture go hand in hand * I think *
nature versus nurture. Nature refers to biological factors such as genetics and hormones, while nurture encompasses environmental and social influences. The debate centers on the relative importance of these factors in shaping psychological differences between men and women.
Culture is important in the nature vs nurture debate because it plays a significant role in shaping an individual's behaviors, beliefs, and values. It highlights how external influences such as upbringing, social environment, and community norms can impact human development alongside genetic inheritance. Understanding the role of culture helps explain variations in human behavior across different societies and emphasizes the interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental influences on individual development.
nature versus nurture debate :)
Nature is the influence of genetics and biology on human behavior and traits, while nurture refers to environmental factors and experience. The strengths of the nature argument include the role of genetics in determining certain traits, like eye color or height. Weaknesses include overlooking the impact of environmental factors such as upbringing and education. On the nurture side, strengths include the ability to change behaviors through environmental interventions, while weaknesses can arise from underestimating the biological basis of certain traits, like intelligence.
nurture -apex :)
The nature versus nurture debate in socialization focuses on the relative importance of genetics (nature) versus environment (nurture) in shaping human behavior and development. Nature proponents argue that biological factors play a significant role, while nurture proponents emphasize the influence of socialization experiences, such as family, peers, and culture. Ultimately, most researchers believe that both nature and nurture interact to shape an individual's socialization process.
nature vs. nurture debate anyone?