answersLogoWhite

0

The main ethical issue to consider in Asch's study is decieving the participants and therefore the lack of informed consent (however, he needed to do this otherwise his results wouldn't have been valid) as well as debriefing. The study may also have caused the participants to experience some distress because when they were debriefed afterwards and found out the aim, they may have felt very embarrassed and mad that they weren't told about it before.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Psychology

What were the ethical considerations and outcomes of the drowning rat experiment?

The drowning rat experiment raised ethical concerns due to the harm inflicted on the rats. The outcomes included insights into the effects of stress and fear on behavior, but the ethical implications of the study have been debated.


What were the ethical implications of the rats drowning experiment conducted in the study?

The rats drowning experiment raised ethical concerns due to the potential harm inflicted on the animals. Researchers faced criticism for subjecting the rats to distress and possible suffering, which raised questions about the ethical treatment of animals in scientific research.


What were the ethical considerations surrounding the drowning rats experiment?

The ethical considerations surrounding the drowning rats experiment involved concerns about the treatment of animals, the potential for unnecessary harm and suffering, and the need to ensure that the research was justified and conducted in a humane manner.


Findings of the Solomon Asch study on conformity?

The Solomon Asch study found that individuals are likely to conform to a group's opinion even when they know it is incorrect, due to social pressure to fit in. This revealed the power of social influence and the importance of individual independence in resisting conformity.


Was is ethical to do this study of the Stanford experiment?

The Stanford Prison Experiment has raised ethical concerns due to the psychological harm experienced by participants. The study lacked proper informed consent and debriefing procedures, which are essential ethical standards in research involving human subjects. Additionally, the power dynamics established in the study were not adequately monitored, leading to the mistreatment of participants.