Critics often make the argument that affirmative action is unconstitutional.
people often revolt as their first course of action
"Carpetbaggers" referred to opportunistic individuals, often from the Northern United States, who moved to the South during the Reconstruction era after the Civil War. They were perceived as exploiting the region's instability for personal gain, often involved in politics, business, and land speculation. The term is derived from the carpet bags they were said to carry, symbolizing their transient and invasive presence in Southern society. It was often used pejoratively by Southern critics who viewed them as outsiders taking advantage of their misfortunes.
U.S. Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America was often accompanied by military intervention.
Thierry often leaves his bike by the back stairs, making it difficult for others to pass without tripping or scraping themselves on it.
found high paying jobs
Affirmative Action has been implemented worldwide. The US, India, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, and France are some of the countries that have been able to successfully use Affirmative Action.
Quota system
The policy often used at colleges to allocate a certain number of spots to minorities is known as affirmative action. This approach aims to promote diversity and equal opportunity in higher education by considering race, ethnicity, or other underrepresented characteristics in the admissions process. Proponents argue it helps address historical inequalities, while critics contend it can lead to reverse discrimination. The legality and implementation of affirmative action policies vary widely across different states and institutions.
Uncovering argument is often used in the legal system. This means a legal allegation delivered during the defense that shows the real purpose of the legal action.
Critics of the cosmological argument often argue that it does not necessarily point to the existence of a specific god or deity, and that it relies on the assumption that everything must have a cause without explaining what caused the initial cause. They also argue that the argument may not provide definitive proof of a god's existence and that it is based on premises that are not universally accepted.
What are you oftentimes criticised for? How did you react to them?
No the Negative doesn'thave to, but usually since the Negative team doesn't know the Affirmative's plan before the debate, the Negative will often run their argument on the stock issue Topicality which means the Affirmative's plan isn't inclusive in the resolution.
For EEOC/affirmative action purposes, a person's ethnicity is the one which he/she identifies with, and/or the one which the community identifies the person as. Note that in cases where individuals do not specify an ethnicity on EEOC/affirmative action forms (i.e. they leave the "ethnicty" box blank), the determination might be made by the future employer/educational institution on the basis of : 1) visual identification; 2) previous employment records; 3) the policy that anyone who fails to identify ethnicity on the AA form will be labeled in the default "white/caucasian" category, and if no gender is indicated, the gender will be listed as "male"; or 4) the policy of utilizing a "race unknown" category for those who do not check any AA box. The "race unknown" category is less often used, as it undercuts the racial divisions which affirmative action seeks to perpetuate. Frequently, due to the arcane and limited categories on AA forms, bi-racial individuals are forced to make a difficult decision about which race to prioritize. Often this decision is based on political expediency, for only certain races receive benefits from affirmative action, and other races are discriminated against in affirmative action policies. Many individuals feel that the concept of forcing a human being to choose among five or six racial skin-tone categories as a measure of "diversity" is absurd and unfair. As such, the policies of affirmative action are highly criticized as they constitute government-endorsed discrimination, and in many cases violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Much of the controversy surrounding affirmative action is actually a mask to disguise the fact that historically, in vast numbers (millions), the fundamental beneficiaries of affirmative action have been white females. Unfortunately, the (often-unfair) stigmatization of affirmative action beneficiaries as "unqualified" almost unilaterally falls on the shoulders of "minorities" whose ethnicities match those on the EEOC/AA form, and many Caucasian women refuse to acknowledge their history of gender-based affirmative action Other controversies surrounding the ethnic divisions on the EEOC/AA form involve the political and financial bonuses which are awarded to the selected "minorities" on the EEOC/AA form, and denied to others. As such, attempts to include a new category, "Bi-Racial" have been hotly disputed, although some recent EEOC forms include a "Bi-Racial" category. It is becoming more and more evident that the public at large feels, as Martin Luther King indicated, that a true measure of a person's diversity lies in the "content of... character," not the "color of skin"... Only when human beings are seen in the true light of their individual personae will real equality and diversity come to fruition.
The affirmative sound may be m'huh but more often mm-hmmor uh-huh.
fat
An argument is a strong disagreement between two or more people. An argument often has heated words and accusations. Generally, not much is accomplished by arguing.
Critics of the Muslim veiling tradition argue that women do not wear the veil by choice, and they are often forced to cover their heads and bodies.