University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case
University California vs. Bakke or the bakke case
The Supreme Court mandated that an immigration quota system was unconstitutional
That would depend on which quota systems you were asking about (you have not made this clear in your question), I do not oppose quota systems in general but made do so in specific cases.
World War 1 led to an increase in immigration restrictions and tighter border controls in many countries. Many countries focused on national security and limited the entry of foreigners, particularly those from enemy countries. This resulted in a decrease in overall immigration during and immediately after the war.
Gerrymandering is the practice of manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to favor one political party or group over another. This can lead to unfair advantages in elections by diluting the voting power of certain groups or concentrating the voting power in specific districts.
The quota system in college admissions has traditionally been an effort to increase diversity and remedy past discrimination. One of the effects has been an increased enrollment of racial minorities and women into colleges. Another effect has been increasing grumblings from other sectors of the public who believe the quota system is a form of favoritism.
Regents of University of California v. Bakke
a quota.
sales volume quota ,expense quota, profit quota, activity quota
sales volume quota ,expense quota, profit quota, activity quota
sales volume quota ,expense quota, profit quota, activity quota