Actually, Aristotle did not contribute to the atomic theory because he was against it...
He did not belive in that theory, because he doesn't belive that everything is made out of atoms.
It formed the basis upon which the rest of chemistry was built.
Democritus - Greek philosopher who believed in the 'marble' atomic model.John Dalton - Came up with the first atomic theory, in which he also believed atoms were indivisible.
Democritus began the atomic theory. He was the first to theorize that if you keep cutting stuff down smaller and smaller, you will eventually reach the smallest piece possible. He was, however, put down by Aristotle. Aristotle had a larger and stronger following, so people dismissed Democritus as a lunatic.
In 335 BCE, Aristotle opened his school, Lucem. He did not believe the Atomic theory and therefore taught his students that all substances were not made up of atoms but something smaller. He believed that everything was made up of small amounts of fire, water, earth and air.
john dalton develop an atomic theory in 1803, based on idea of the atomic exsiting
With Aristotle and the ancient Greeks.
feet
It disproved Aristotle's four-element theory of matter.
he invented biology
he did not develop anything regarding the 'atomic theory' for he was against that theory.
Aristotle did not propose an atomic theory; instead, he rejected the concept of atoms put forth by his predecessor, Democritus. Aristotle believed in the idea of continuous matter rather than discrete particles.
nothing
Aristotle did not believe in the Atomic Theory. He believed that everything was made up of only 4 elements fire, water, air, and earth. This theory was proven incorrect as is evidenced by the periodic table of elements. In short the answer to this question is, none.
1955
Aristotle was against atomic theory considering that matter is formed from fire, air, earth and water.His conceptions delayed the development of science especially because of the harmful influence of Christianity.
Actually Aristotle wasn't known to contribute to the evolution theory as he didn't agree with most of the theories that were brought up by other philosophers. The only contribution he might have taken apart of was causing conflict between other philosophers and other theory discoveries.
He dissected animals and studied the ways that they reproduce.