Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, like, the Jewish temple curtain was said to be around 60 feet high and 30 feet wide, made of thick material. I mean, I don't have a scale handy to weigh it for you, but I'm pretty sure it was heavy enough to make a loud rip when it tore in two.
A:The gospels say that at the very moment Jesus died, the veil, or curtain, at the entrance to the Holy of Holies was rent from top to bottom ("And the curtain in the sanctuary of the Temple was torn in two, from top to bottom." - Mark 15:38). Josephus, who would have been familiar with the Temple veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, describes the curtain and its images and colours in considerable detail (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), saying that it was made of flax. Based on his description, the curtain was not particularly thick. Interestingly, Josephus makes no mention of any damage to it, or any repairs.
A:The gospels say that at the very moment Jesus died, the veil, or curtain, at the entrance to the Holy of Holies was rent from top to bottom ("And the curtain in the sanctuary of the Temple was torn in two, from top to bottom." - Mark 15:38). There has to be some doubt about this account, as Josephus, who would have been familiar with the Temple veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, describes the curtain and its images and colours in considerable detail (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), but makes no mention of any damage to it, or any repairs.
You can rent a tow truck in Temple, TX by going to templetowing.com and check out their prices.
A:The gospels say that at the very moment Jesus died, the veil, or curtain, at the entrance to the Holy of Holies was rent from top to bottom ("And the curtain in the sanctuary of the Temple was torn in two, from top to bottom." - Mark 15:38). The Temple veil, or curtain, was described in considerable detail (Wars of the Jews, Book 5) by the historian, Josephus, who was a priest before 70 CE and would have been familiar with it. Josephus makes no mention of any damage to it, nor any evidence of repairs, as anyone familiar with the gospel account would expect.The gospel account was actually written after the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE and could therefore be expected to be the last word on the tearing of the veil, so it is only fortuitous that someone who knew about the appearance of the curtain before that time, chose to write in so much detail about it.
The rent curtain most commonly refers to the ripping of the heavy curtain that separated the room where the ark of the covenant was held and where God was present, from the common people. Only the most holy of holy priests were allowed entrance into this room. With the death of Jesus Christ, the curtain was ripped from top to bottom, representing the destruction of separation.
A:Many Christians believe that at the very moment Jesus died, the veil, or curtain, at the entrance to the Holy of Holies was rent from top to bottom (Mark 15:38). Some who read the Bible carefully are aware that the followers of Jesus could not have seen the curtain in order to know this, and anyone who could see the curtains would have been unaware of Jesus' death far off, outside the city walls. Christians who study theology may be aware that the Jewish historian, Josephus, who would have been familiar with the Temple veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, describes the curtain and its images and colours in considerable detail (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), but makes no mention of any damage to it, or any repairs.
A:The gospels say that at the very moment Jesus died, the veil, or curtain, at the entrance to the Holy of Holies was rent from top to bottom ("And the curtain in the sanctuary of the Temple was torn in two, from top to bottom." - Mark 15:38). Mark might have been using an unreliable source, as Josephus, who would have been familiar with the Temple veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, describes the curtain and its images and colours in considerable detail (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), but makes no mention of any damage to it, or any repairs.Another Answer:God the Father split the Inner Veil down the middle spoken to by Matthew, Mark, and Luke - while referred to several times by Paul in Hebrews.
LUKE
He didn't have a brother.
The gospels say that at the moment of Jesus' death, the veil (curtain) of the Temple was rent from top to bottom. Surprisingly, the Jewish historian, Josephus, in describing the veil, Makes no mention of this damage or of any repairs that should have been apparent. As a former priest at the Temple, he would have been familiar with the veil before the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. He say (Wars of the Jews, Book 5), "It was a Babylonian curtain, embroidered with blue, and fine linen, and scarlet, and purple, and of a contexture that was truly wonderful. Nor was this mixture of colors without its mystical interpretation, but was a kind of image of the universe; for by the scarlet there seemed to be enigmatically signified fire, by the fine flax the earth, by the blue the air, and by the purple the sea; two of them having their colors the foundation of this resemblance; but the fine flax and the purple have their own origin for that foundation, the earth producing the one, and the sea the other. This curtain had also embroidered upon it all that was mystical in the heavens, excepting that of the [twelve] signs, representing living creatures." The one historian who ought to have known of the damage to the veil talks as if it never happened.
According to the synoptic gospels, yes:In Mark's Gospel, followed by Matthew and Luke, there was a great darkness that can not be explained as an eclipse, but which was not recorded outside the gospels. The Temple curtain was rent from top to bottom.In Matthew's Gospel, there was also a great earthquake that opened the graves. The dead arose and walked into Jerusalem, where they were seen by many. This miracle is not in the other gospels and is not attested outside the Bible.
This is a great question since the little verse found below seems to be inexplicable without it.7And the word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly; and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith. The priests, who performed the temple service knew how the thick curtain which separated the Most Holy Place, where God's presence was said to dwell (though they of course also believed that the most high does not just dwell in temple's made with human hands) from the Holy Place - they clearly knew, since that was their particular and special occupation, how no-one would dare, or even could enter that place except the High Priest, once a year, to make atonement for the people. The priest also knew that no mortal could tear that curtain -it was so thick and strong.The fact that a great many of them believed verifies the fact, to those who wish to ponder it a little while, hidden from the general public, of what went on at the time when Jesus died.The Gospel record seems to suggest that this was at the precise moment when Jesus died.50Jesus, when he had cried again with a loud voice, yielded up the ghost. 51And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent; This of course is particularly mentioned in Matthew (since he wrote for the Jews and highlighted things of interest to them which would have required long and detailed explanations for Gentiles). He does not state it explicitly either, possibly due to a reverence for the divine name, but it is clear that this was a supernatural event and could have only been performed by the hand of almighty God -not just in terms of strength (much less than almightiness being required here), but in terms of who did it. No Jew, not even the high priest himself would dare to perform such an act were they able.The tearing of the Temple curtain was an emphatic statement that the separation between God and a Holy God was at an end and that such symbolic acts as performed by the High Priest were no longer necessary, since Christ the ultimate passover Lamb had been slain to atone for the sins of the whole world and to thereby open the way to God and His presence. The curtain really symbolized the great separation that must exist between man and a God who is perfect in all His ways and in His very nature. Such was now done away with by the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross. Those priests who were 'on duty' at the time of course knew about this first, and the evidence was before the rest as the terrible news spread, as would have the realization of when it happened. All this explaining the testimony of Acts 6:7. In summary, the tearing of the temple curtain was done by almighty God, who saw the finished work of His son on the cross and was satisfied.