No, Pluralists did not deny the existence of elites. Instead, they recognized that society is composed of various groups with different interests, including elites. Pluralists believed that power is dispersed among multiple groups in society rather than concentrated in the hands of a single elite.
The question should have read: Do most people who claim to be religious pluralists really believe in it or is it just a convenient way to get along with everyone?
Pluralists generally see interest groups as a gathering of people who happen to share a common interest. Perhaps, since they are pluralists, they see many of them.
Power is held by many people
i love dani Lara for life
resulting from competing group interactions
Pluralists
This is a response to the obvious over-optimism of the pluralists. Critics of pluralists claim that weaker groups in society do not have much influence. Some individuals have restricted access to decision making. • This is recognised by elite pluralists who modify their theories because they say that restrictions on access to power is minimised because politicians will try to gain votes by appealing to the weaker groups. The party system exists to represent the uninvolved 'common man'.
legal pluralists
Individual interests are indirectly represented in the policymaking process through these groups.
Supporters of pluralist theory believe that interest groups further democracy by allowing diverse voices and interests to be represented within the political system. They argue that interest groups help to balance power among different groups and prevent any one group from dominating decision-making.
James Madison and other pluralists