Microscopes
one-celled organisms like amoebas don't "see" they detect changes in their environment
Yes. One celled or unicellular organisms are so small you would need a strong microscope to see one.
Multi because they are living and breathing. Something like a rock would be single celled.
An amoeba!Wrong - You see an amobe is not an animal to begin instead it is only a one celled particular lifeformIt is totally an animal.Amoeba is a genus that includes species such as Amoeba proteus
The microscope
one-celled organisms like amoebas don't "see" they detect changes in their environment
No. unicellular organisms only have one cell, so they can only be seen under a microscope.
No, but there are organisms that consists of one cell and those that consists of many cells. Deer, bears, and any other animal you can see, including humans, are multiple celled, and the ones that require an imaging scope are single celled.
Yes. One celled or unicellular organisms are so small you would need a strong microscope to see one.
There are no single-celled organisms large enough for you to actually see with your naked eye. All animals you can see are multiple cells.
Every organism you can see. Animals,plants are examples
Amoeba are single-celled organisms which are very often large enough to see with the naked eye, and are sometimes as large as grapes.As the term "single-celled organism" implies, the entire creature is in fact one cell.an eukaroytic cell
Scientists can see th fossils and the living organisms.
No. Single-celled organisms are too small to see without a microscope. An anteater can be mroe than 2 metres head to tail.
Scientists classify organisms by the dichotomous key. They classify by looking at if it moves or not, then they look at characteristics, then they can see what they are.
Multi because they are living and breathing. Something like a rock would be single celled.
They see similarities with structures between modern day organisms and older organisms.