answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

1.How does Machiavelli view human nature?

Machiavelli differs from the many political theorists who offer conceptions of a "natural

state," a presocial condition arising solely from human instinct and character. But while

Machiavelli never puts forth a vision of what society would be like without civil

government, he nonetheless presents a coherent, although not particularly comprehensive,

vision of human nature. Machiavelli mentions explicitly a number of traits innate among

humans. People are generally self-interested, although their affections for others can be

won and lost. They remain content and happy so long they avoid affliction or oppression.

They might be trustworthy in prosperous times, but they can turn selfish, deceitful, and

profit-driven in adverse times. They admire honor, generosity, courage, and piety in

others, but most do not harbor these virtues. Ambition lies among those who have

achieved some power, but most common people are satisfied with the way things are and

therefore do not yearn to improve on the status quo. People will naturally feel obligated

after receiving a favor or service, and this bond is usually not broken capriciously.

Nevertheless, loyalties are won and lost, and goodwill is never absolute. These statements

about human nature often serve as justification for much of Machiavelli's advice to

princes. For example, a prince should never trust mercenary leaders because they, like

most leaders, are overly ambitious. At the same time, while many of Machiavelli's

remarks on the subject seem reasonable, most are assumptions not grounded in evidence

or popular notions and can easily be criticized. For example, a Hobbesian might argue

that Machiavelli puts too much faith in people's ability to remain content in the absence

of government force. A related issue to explore, then, might be the extent to which

Machiavelli's political theory relies too heavily on any single, possibly fallacious

depiction of human nature

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Braden Barger

Lvl 1
3y ago
THANKYOU SOOOOO MUCH...
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

Machiavelli believed that human nature is inherently selfish and prone to deceit, and that people are primarily motivated by self-interest and ambition. He argued that rulers should be willing to use any means necessary, including deception and brutality, in order to maintain power and control.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Machiavelli lived in the 14 and 1500s and as a philosopher he advised rulers in his book The Prince(1532) that they were more effective leaders if they ruled their people by fear. "It is better to rule by fear than by love." Although it seems cruel, which was what he was suggesting, many rulers followed his advise.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

He thought about doing your mom was the greatest he could do.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

self centered

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What did Machiavelli think about human nature?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Machiavelli encouraged rulers and would-be rulers to believe what?

human nature was self-centered


What did petrarch and Machiavelli have in common?

Petrarch and Machiavelli were both Italian Renaissance writers who deeply influenced literature and political thought. Despite their different areas of focus (Petrarch on poetry and humanism, Machiavelli on political philosophy), they both grappled with the complexities of human nature and ethics in their works.


How is machiavelli ideal for human behavior antithetical to erasmus in the prince of machiavelli?

Machiavelli's ideal for human behavior in "The Prince" emphasizes power, ruthlessness, and deceit for political success, while Erasmus advocates for virtues like kindness and honesty in "The Praise of Folly." Machiavelli believes that leaders should prioritize effectiveness over morality, whereas Erasmus promotes a more ethical and humanistic approach to governance. This fundamental difference in their philosophies reflects contrasting views on leadership and human nature.


Can an animal change its nature to human nature?

i think that we were not at all any monkeys so animals can not change there nature to human nature


From Machiavelli's point of view what attitude should a prince have toward power?

it should be based on an understanding of human nature, which he believed was basically self-centered


Why was Machiavelli not a Machiavellian?

Machiavelli is often seen as not embodying the characteristics of a Machiavellian figure because his work "The Prince" was mainly a commentary on political strategy and government rather than a guide for deceit and manipulation. Additionally, Machiavelli's other works, such as his historical writings, show a more nuanced and complex understanding of human nature and ethics.


What is the dark side of human nature?

The Blind Side of Human Nature.


I like tornadoes do you?

I think it's human nature to be fascinated by them.


How did hobbes think differently about human nature from Locke?

Hobbes believed that humans are inherently self-interested and driven by a desire for power and survival. He thought humans were naturally in a state of conflict and chaos, leading to the need for a strong central authority to maintain order. Locke, on the other hand, believed that humans are born as blank slates, with the potential for reason and cooperation, and that they have natural rights to life, liberty, and property.


Why do humans defy science or nature by breaking records?

It's just human nature and the way we think.


How was Niccolo Machiavelli important to the world?

He wrote about human nature and he was one of the first people in literature that wrote in the vernacular or the everyday language. Which came before Latin. I'm in seventh grade l0l


When was Human Nature - Human Nature album - created?

Human Nature - Human Nature album - was created on 2000-12-01.