Affirming the decision of the lower court means that the appeals court concluded that no error was committed during the lower court trial and that the lower court's decision stands.
It means that whatever was previously decided was upheld.
It means that the appelate court (or whoever) has upheld the validity of your appeal.
it means your face
Affirmed - Reversed - Remanded
In the US Supreme Court it was reversed in part and affirmed in part. For decision see below:
"Affirmed," meaning that the appellate court agreed with the ruling of the lower court; "reversed" (or "overturned") meaning that the appellate court did not agree with the ruling of the lower court; and "remanded for further proceedings" meaning that the case could not be resolved or fully resolved on appeal and requires further hearings or argument in the lower court.Affirmed - Reversed - Remanded
The disposition of an appeal is the judge's final ruling in the case, or what he decides to do to it. The three most common dispositions are: Affirmed, in which the judge agrees with the lower court and the original ruling stands, Reversed, in which the judge disagrees with the lower court and invalidates that opinion, and Remanded, in which the judge sends the case down to a lower court for further action. Cases are often both reversed and remanded.
This wording sounds like part of an appeals court decision. 'Affimed in part' - mean that the original decision/findings were found to be proper and correct. 'Reversed in part' - means that a portion of the decision/findings was found to legally insufficient. 'Remanded' - means that the case was returned to the originating court to review or reconsider its actions in the case and make it 'legally sufficient' to conform with the law.
Mandate affirmed means that on has been authorized to act in a specific way. This relates to public issues and the authority is given by the electorate.
Texas v. Johnson, 491 US 397 (1989) was in litigation for five years, gradually moving from municipal court to the US Supreme Court. Johnson was arrested in August 1984 and the US Supreme Court affirmed the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' (Texas high court for criminal cases) reversal in June 1989, just a bit less than five years later.1984 Convicted: Dallas County Criminal Court, fined $2,000 and sentenced to 1 year in jail1986 Affirmed: The Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, Dallas 706 S.W.2d 120 (1986)1988 Reversed: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed, 755 S.W.2d 92 (1988)1989 Affirmed: Supreme Court of the United States.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed
Judgement AFFIRMED.
The judgment is affirmed.
If your statement is true (I doubt that EVERY case is affirmed) it must mean that the lower courts are doing their jobs correctly.