This phrase suggests that those who are victorious in a conflict or competition have the power to shape and control the narrative of what happened, often leaving out or downplaying perspectives from the losing side. It highlights the idea that historical accounts are often biased and may not always reflect the full truth of what occurred.
History is written by the winners. Only one side of the story you see.
Because history is written by the winners.
It is done by the winners. Written history generally reflects the viewpoint of those who have won wars or cultural battles.
HistoryThe written record of mankind is called history. It is a story, the story written by the winners of wars (those who have lost wars do not get to write their versions).
There is a saying that the winners write the history books. People are generally more likely to want to talk about success rather than defeat. There are examples of heroic defeat in history, but it is far less common than the so called glorious victory.Yes, I do think the winners write the history books.
History is written by the winners. Government and media's official statements about events can cahnge history. Text books and authors can influence our effect on history. Events we witness effect our perception of history.
History is written by the winners. Government and media's official statements about events can cahnge history. Text books and authors can influence our effect on history. Events we witness effect our perception of history.
it is the history about what has been written, rather than what has happened
Ballabriggs! :) Comment: Yes, that was in 2011 when that answer was written. There have been over a hundred and fifty winners in the history of this race.
history
Difficult to judge since history is written by the winners. Perhaps Russia was simply ripe for revolution at that time.
Lois Cantwell has written: 'Women winners' 'Freedom' -- subject(s): Freedom, Freedom of association, Freedom of information, Freedom of religion, History, Juvenile literature