Inceases its efficiency.
Deceasing friction increases efficiency and reduces heat loss.
A lubricant such as oil and ball bearings are just (2) methods of reducing friction.
Wear and tear of moving parts would be reduced. Less energy would be needed to run the machine, as there would be less friction to be overcome. A well lubricated machine is more efficient than a neglected machine with unoiled parts.
Lubricants are solely used for reducing friction between two moving parts of a machine.
Machine without any friction is an ideal machine so an ideal machine cannot have friction.
Friction is the reason that you can never have a 100% efficient machine. It is the reason that most machine have horrible efficiency.
Deceasing friction increases efficiency and reduces heat loss.
It maximizes it, by reducing the internal losses to friction.
A lubricant such as oil and ball bearings are just (2) methods of reducing friction.
Wear and tear of moving parts would be reduced. Less energy would be needed to run the machine, as there would be less friction to be overcome. A well lubricated machine is more efficient than a neglected machine with unoiled parts.
the relationship between them is that the machines have friction that makes the machine goes
Lubricants are solely used for reducing friction between two moving parts of a machine.
Machine without any friction is an ideal machine so an ideal machine cannot have friction.
no
by reducing the mass you reduce the friction, and by reducing the friction reduce the fuel needed to move the car, this applies to all cars not only CO2 cars.
A. By decreasin the work inut to the machine without increasing output B. By reducing losses due to friction C. By increasing the ork ouput of the machine wihout increasing input D. All of the above D. ALL OF THE ABOVE
Actually, they don't. Are you talking about reducing pollution?