answersLogoWhite

0

When a judgment states that the plaintiff takes nothing by this action, it means that the court has ruled in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief or compensation. The phrase "the defendant shall go hence without day" indicates that the defendant is released from the case and does not have to return to court for this matter. Essentially, the defendant wins, and the case is concluded in their favor without any further obligations.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What happens if you and the defendant don't show up on a hearing for child support case at court?

You lose. If the defendant doesn't show up for their notified court hearing, a default judgment will be made against them. If the plaintiff doesn't show up, the case will be dismissed. In the case of a defendant, the plaintiff will then go about collecting the award through garnishment of wages and placing liens on property.


If a defendant fails to answer a case in federal court is default automatic?

Yes, in federal court, if a defendant fails to respond to a complaint within the specified time frame, a default judgment can be entered against them. However, the plaintiff must formally request a default from the court, and the court has discretion to deny the request under certain circumstances. Once a default is entered, the plaintiff may then seek a default judgment, which can lead to a ruling in their favor without the defendant's participation.


What is the consequence of plaintiff failure to appear in Virginia district court?

If the defendant fails to appear in a civil court lawsuit, the plaintiff can motion the court for what is known as a default judgement. In laymen terms, they win. If the defendant shows up but the plaintiff did not, they can motion to have the case dismissed with prejudice. This means that the person who sued them cannot bring the same matter back to the courts again.


How do you note the plaintiff in default civil procedure?

In civil procedure, noting the plaintiff in default typically involves filing a motion or request with the court when the plaintiff fails to take necessary actions, such as responding to a complaint or participating in the proceedings. The defendant must provide evidence of the plaintiff's inaction and may also need to serve notice to the plaintiff. Once the court grants the motion, a default judgment can be requested, allowing the defendant to proceed without the plaintiff's participation. Always check local rules, as procedures can vary by jurisdiction.


When defendant answers a complaint without being served by plaintiff must the plaintiff still properly serve complaint?

Yes, the plaintiff must still properly serve the complaint on the defendant. The fact that the defendant answers the complaint without being served does not waive the requirement for proper service. Proper service is necessary to provide notice to the defendant and ensure that they have a fair opportunity to respond to the lawsuit.


What happens if you refuse court papers from a process server hired by an attorney or collection agency?

If the issue is one of a civil suit, the lawsuit will continue without the defendant responding. In such cases the plaintiff is awarded a default judgment and can execute that judgment in the manner allowed by the debtor's state.


Pro se Plaintiff having received answer to complaint on summons what is next step plaintiff needs to take?

If there are counterclaims, then pro se plaintiff needs to file his own answer. You also want to consider any afformative defenses asserted by the defendant and their merit.


What does a plaintiff do in court?

A plaintiffs role is one who brings a case to court


What if you do not receive the summons for debt collections?

In civil suit for debt owed, the plaintiff only needs to demonstrate to the court that they have made a reasonable attempt to serve notice on the defendant debtor. If the debtor cannot be found the lawsuit will still go forward without the participation of the named defendant. However, in most U.S. states the defendant must be duly served according to the laws of the state in which he or she resides with a final judgment notice before a judgment writ can be executed. The service of said writ upon the debtor can be by a designated agent of the plaintiff and/or certified mail and/or courier (UPS, FedEx, etc.). The defendant is given a specific time to respond to the judgment order citing allowable personal and real property exemptions that are exempt from seizure, garnishment, levy, and so forth.


What does thepolicy that prohibits a defendant's request to limit damages because a plaintiff has received the benefits of an insurance policy involves?

The policy that prohibits a defendant from limiting damages based on a plaintiff's receipt of insurance benefits is rooted in the principle of avoiding "collateral source" offsets. This doctrine maintains that a defendant cannot reduce their liability by arguing that the plaintiff has been compensated by an insurance policy, as this would unfairly diminish the plaintiff's recovery. The rationale is that the plaintiff has paid for insurance and should not be penalized for having that coverage when seeking damages. Ultimately, this policy aims to ensure that defendants are fully accountable for their actions without regard to the plaintiff’s independent financial arrangements.


Can a judgment be filed against a person without going to court?

No, even if the plaintiff wins the case through arbitration they will still need to file a petition with the court of venue to receive a writ of judgment. On the other side, however, if the defendant fails to respond to a summons pertaining to a lawsuit or judgment he/she will lose by default and may not be able to claim any of their property exemptions.


Can someone show an example of a case where a motion for a summary judgment will be granted?

Summary judgment is granted when there is no dispute as to any of the material facts in the incident that caused the lawsuit so that, as a matter of law, one party or the other is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In a suit on a credit card bill, if the defendant does not dispute that he is responsible for the full amount claimed by the credit card company, but just won't pay it, the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment without having to go to trial because the defendant admits the debt. There is no genuine issue of material fact that has to be resolved by trial. Now if the defendant denies that he is responsible for all or part of the debt (for instance if the card had been stolen and charges were billed for purchases not made by the defendant but the credit card company does not believe him) there is an issue of material fact that has to be determined at a trial. The issue is did the defendant actually make the charges or not. Summary judgment cannot be granted as long as there is a genuine issue.