answersLogoWhite

0

Act only on that maxim thru which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law

well at least that my prof. says

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the purpose of the universalizability test in ethical decision-making?

The purpose of the universalizability test in ethical decision-making is to determine if an action is morally acceptable by evaluating whether it can be applied consistently to all similar situations without leading to contradictions or negative consequences.


The statement that if an action is not right for everyone to take it is not right for anyone to take is an expression of?

This statement reflects the ethical principle of universalizability, which is commonly attributed to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. It suggests that actions should be evaluated based on their universal application and whether they can be consistently applied to everyone in similar situations.


According to Kant, why would making a false promise be considered immoral?

According to Kant, making a false promise is considered immoral because it violates the principle of universalizability. Kant believed that if everyone made false promises, trust and communication would break down in society, leading to chaos and harm to others.


What is one formulation of Kants categorical imperative?

One formulation of Kant's categorical imperative is the principle of universalizability, which states that you should only act on those maxims (personal principles or motivations) that you can will to be a universal law applicable to everyone. In other words, if you wouldn't want everyone to act in the same way you're considering, then you shouldn't act that way yourself.


What are kant's three principles of morality?

Kant's three principles of morality are: 1) the principle of universalizability, which states that an action must be applicable to all individuals in similar situations; 2) the principle of humanity, which requires treating individuals as ends in themselves, not merely as means to an end; and 3) the principle of autonomy, which emphasizes individual rational self-governance in determining moral duties.


Is kant's categorical imperative the best expression of moral duty?

Kant's categorical imperative is one of many theories of moral duty. Some find it compelling because of its emphasis on rationality and universalizability, while others may prefer different approaches such as consequentialism or virtue ethics. The best expression of moral duty will vary depending on individual beliefs and values.


What did Kant say about greed?

Kant argued that greed, or avarice, is morally wrong because it involves prioritizing self-interest over moral duties and treating others merely as means to achieve personal gain. He believed that moral actions should be guided by the principle of universalizability, meaning that one's actions should be based on principles that could be applied to everyone without contradiction.


What solution does a Kantian approach offer?

A Kantian approach emphasizes the importance of moral duty and the principles of universalizability and respect for persons. It advocates for actions to be guided by reason and the categorical imperative, which suggests that one should act only according to maxims that could be universally applied. This framework promotes ethical consistency and accountability, encouraging individuals to treat others as ends in themselves rather than as means to an end. Ultimately, it offers a rational basis for moral decision-making that prioritizes autonomy and ethical responsibility.


What is Kant's Categorical Imperative?

It is the universal law that will comply with all people that can rationally think and make a morally correct decision that is not based upon their own desires. To not cause harm or inflict damage upon another agent ( another person). The Categorical Imperative deals with universalizability and states that an act is immoral if it cannot be made into a rule for all humankind to follow. For example, if I say "I will never keep my promises", this would be considered to be immoral because it cannot be applied to all people, for if it were, no-one would keep their promises and promises would lose all meaning.


What does (.)(.) mean?

you mean what you mean


What does descriptor mean?

It mean what you don't what does it mean.


What does mean mean in statistics?

Mean is the average.