That which does not provide evidence for evolution is not necessarily something that tends to disprove evolution. So it is hard to narrow down to something relevant but does not provide evidence for evolution. As for something that actually tends to disprove evolution, this is equally hard but for different reasons - the evidence for evolution is so overwhelming that there is very little that can provide any form of contrary evidence.
Some interpretations of a few religious texts don't allow for evolution, which leads to many people ignoring scientific evidence (since they cannot really disavow the evidence, which is a completely different argument, but honestly, i have never heard a logical argument that did not rely on fallacy to disavow evolution - and many learned men have tried)
Whether you believe it or not is up to you, but to ignore scientific evidence in lieu of a religious text, while a testament to your faith, is very simply that, ignorance of evidence.
The fact that the Moon always shows the same face towards the Earth does not provide evidence that living things have been evolving for millions of years.
Is there a list? Continental drift is real, so religious fanatics don't provide evidence for continental drift.
A creationist idea of " transitional " forms. The crocaduck, a dog giving birth to kittens and other nonsense that would violate the basic tenets of evolutionary theory.
Interference patterns produced in Young's twin slit experiment.
Faith that the scientific method always leads to the truth
Homologous structures
Short answer: yes. Everything we observe about the shape, behaviour and genetics of organisms in all shapes and sizes can and does provide evidence for evolution.
In themselves, they do not.
They don't. Homologous structures provide evidence for evolution not analogous structures.
The study of: (i) Cladistics: regional biodiversity, race circles, and geographical isolation; (ii) Genetics: DNA, chromosomes, viral insertions, common mutations; and (iii) Paleontology: fossils. These are some of the types of evidence for evolution.
Fossils, patterns of early development, similar body structures, DNA, and protein structures.
Short answer: yes. Everything we observe about the shape, behaviour and genetics of organisms in all shapes and sizes can and does provide evidence for evolution.
swag bissh
In themselves, they do not.
Paleontological and archeological evidence about hominid evolution.
Fossils provide amazing evidence for the theory of evolution and the long history of life on Earth.
Camouflage in itself doesn't provide evidence for evolution. However, seen in a large number of species living under varying circumstances, the range of types of camouflage and how they match their environments gives a big clue as to how evolution works.
Establishes relative position of sedimentary rock.
the beaks were different on every island
how does the fossil record provide evidence for evolution?!
They don't. Homologous structures provide evidence for evolution not analogous structures.
I don't believe it does! The teeth were added after the discovery.
i do not have any idea