Technology was the single biggest factor in WW1 being waged the way it was.
Military strategy had yet to fully understand how to use recent technological advances (particularly, the machinegun, heavy artillery, and the submarine). As a consequence, old strategies turned out to be completely useless (or, worse, massive failures). The manner in which most of the fighting in WW1 occurred reflects military leadership slowly groping about to fully understand how these new technologies worked, and the implications for strategy and tactics. That is, how to effectively use these new weapons, and, on the other side, how to effectively counter their use.
The sad fact is that military leadership on both sides during WW1 was sadly lacking in intelligence and the ability to grasp that these new technologies had radically changed warfare, and that a corresponding whole new paradigm of tactics was required. Their stupidity cost Europeans 4 long years of war, and 10 million deaths.
Wiki User
∙ 2010-11-12 04:29:08Yes
Technology developed during the war was used for consumer products.
Following World War Two, Australia had been changed by the end of 1950's by communism, transport and technology
The destructive nature of the technology led to higher casualties
theres no technology in world war 1 lol :)
Technology provided more efficient killing via machine guns and also provided code breaking for secret massages.
Some of the new technologies of World War I led to devastating casualties. These new weapons included machine guns and poison gas.
that is why technology and tactics had there own purposes in world war 1
how world war 2 affect music
How did world war 2 affect religion
Technology developed during the war was used for consumer products.
Technology developed during the war was used for consumer products.