The facts that provide evidence that the space within our Universe was almost infinitely dense about 13.7 billion years ago, and has been expanding at a (pretty much) steady rate ever since, are overwhelmingly persuasive.
1) The distance between us and all distant galaxies is increasing, and the rate at which that distance is increasing is directly proportional to the distance to those distant galaxies.
2) The existence, spectrum, and isotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation.
3) The ratio of hydrogen to helium in all parts of our Universe.
4) Quasars are seen far from us, but not close to us.
5) The ratio of long-lived isotopes to their decay products.
6) The absence of white dwarf stars older than about ten billion years.
These facts make Big Bang Cosmology as solid an idea as a heliocentric solar system.
The Big Bang Theory is a widly accepted theory in the scientific world because of the fact that it has less loopholes than others made to oppose it.I believe 1-2 loopholes are contained in The Big Bang Theory.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
NO. take Darwin's theory of evolution for example. there is no real evidence, but it is accepted as fact by most in America today.
The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.
Given by the fact that electromegnetic energy cannot be seen and how the radiation from distant galaxies supports the big bang theory? it can easily be said that...I dont know the answer. (0_0)
The cosmic background radiation - in the microwave part of the electromagnetic spectrum.
They didn't; the big bang theory is just an idea or a theory, not a fact. The empirical evidence that our Universe was, 13.7 billion years ago, much more dense that it is now, is overwhelming. No other explanation even begins to explain what we observe in our Universe. Saying the Big Bang is a "just an idea or theory" is like saying gravity is "just an idea or a theory, not a fact."
The continuous expansion of the Universe, with all Galaxies receding from each other, is the foundation observation. The Big Bang is the computed start point when all lay together. And where physics as we know it is quite insufficient to probe.
The Big bang theory states that the galaxies are in fact moving away from each other
The Big Bang Theory is a widly accepted theory in the scientific world because of the fact that it has less loopholes than others made to oppose it.I believe 1-2 loopholes are contained in The Big Bang Theory.
The redshift of distant galaxies, which is normally attributed to the Doppler effect.=========================Comment #1:It's important to include in the answer the fact that the question speaks ofhow science is NOT done. Evidence is not used to support theory. Theoryis the attempt to explain existing evidence. THAT's how science works.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Antonyms of theory include fact, reality, evidence, and truth.
NO. take Darwin's theory of evolution for example. there is no real evidence, but it is accepted as fact by most in America today.
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
A theory becomes a fact when that theory is supported by experimental evidence.
The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.The Steady State theory is now an obsolete theory. It was an interesting alternative to the normal Big Bang theory, but it doesn't agree with observations.