In any experimental test there are factors that can contribute to error. For example in a biochemical test if you add the compounds with a faulty pippete then the amount of reagent per sample would vary and that would contribute to a noisy measurement. So by controlling experimental conditions as best as one is able error can be reduced. Never completely eliminated, but managed.
There isn't one. 7 cannot reduce and 18 can reduce, but not in a factor of 7.
Same as fractions. Check if there is a common factor, then divide both numbers by the common factor.
49
No birth control in Romania.
You should reduce a fraction if the numerator and denominator have any common factor greater than one.
The significance level can be reduced.
first do you reduce the voltage level or increase the load factor
Kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed. If you reduce the speed by a factor of 12, the kinetic energy will reduce by a factor of 12 x 12 = 144.Kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed. If you reduce the speed by a factor of 12, the kinetic energy will reduce by a factor of 12 x 12 = 144.Kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed. If you reduce the speed by a factor of 12, the kinetic energy will reduce by a factor of 12 x 12 = 144.Kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed. If you reduce the speed by a factor of 12, the kinetic energy will reduce by a factor of 12 x 12 = 144.
Controls are designed to reduce or eliminate risk.
no one knows.
The voltage must reduce by the same factor - that is Ohm's law.
The greatest common factor is used to reduce fractions.
It means to divide by x. For example, if I were to reduce 4 by a factor of x, I would get 4/x.If I reduced x by a factor of x, I would get x/x, which is equal to 1.
To reduce fractions
There isn't one. 7 cannot reduce and 18 can reduce, but not in a factor of 7.
Controls are designed to reduce or eliminate risk.
In general, the way to reduce effective Q in a parallel RLC circuit is to reduce the value of R.