Want this question answered?
Yes as they are negative you can conclude, the test is negative and nothing to worry.
You need to do chemistry university and have good grade.You usually take a test wich qualifys you to work as a forensic scientist...
Yes, almost any measurement has a range of uncertainty. In addition, you must consider the errors inherent in taking samples, and the expert opinion on the reliability of the test method. With fingerprints for example, these are commonly considered infallible. But that depends upon how many points of comparison were made. [The points of comparison are forks, whorls, arches, and so on of the fingerprint ridges.] Currently, a 7 point match is considered good, but a 4 or 5 point match is much more suspect. In science in general, peer review of test methods is one of the 'gold standards'. In the case of fingerprints, say, the peer review test should be carried out on a number of prints, at a number of laboratories. Seldom does evidence presented have such a quality history.
Polygraphs are used as an interrogation tool with criminal suspects or candidates for sensitive public or private sector employment. The use and effectiveness of the polygraph is controversial, with the manner of its use and its validity subject to increasing criticism.
YES! Every pregnancy test is different and if the instructions are not followed 100% then there is a chance you could read a false negative. I suggest taking another test and if that dos not give you a conclusive answer or you are still unsure if the test is correct, consult your doctor for a blood test.
The creator of forensic chemistry is considered James Marsh who prepared in 1836 an arsenic test.
noty sure answer it your self
There are no reliable symptoms that point to HIV infection. An HIV test is considered conclusive if conducted 90 days after the most recent exposure.
But it does not give clear-cut information. The results of a CEA test are usually considered along with other laboratory and/or imaging studies to follow the course of the disease.
The test of ethyl and methyl alcohol may provide some evidence, but it is not necessarily conclusive. Further analysis and testing could be needed to confirm the presence and differentiate between the two types of alcohol definitively.
two
the test is in conclusive. may be you did it worng or it is expired?
When collecting gunpowder residue for analysis, yes, this is an accepted test.
HIV testing is considered conclusive 90 days after the most recent risk for infection. If the last time you were at risk for infection was six months ago, and you just had an HIV test performed, it would be considered conclusive.
Paper is not soluble in vinegar.A simple test is conclusive for you.
Benedict solution is considered as a Simi quantitative test because of it's change in colour range depending to the number of reducing sugar in the sample being tested ,this can be use to determine the amount of reducing sugars but never totally conclusive
With modern HIV tests, yes, a 10-week test is conclusive. 95% of people infected with HIV with seroconvert and test positive after 6 weeks, and by 10 weeks it's just over 99%. By 13 weeks, it's 99.99%. For most people who do not seroconvert by 10 weeks, it may be because of some other health problem (for example, the immuno-suppression drugs taken by transplant patients), so unless you fall into that category, your test is conclusive.