The paranoia increased in the south, prompting harsher slave laws. In addition, the sectionalism between the north and south increased. Some southerners even believed abolitionists were eager to cause other slave insurrections to end slavery.
It can easily be said that when all the other reasons for the Southern rebellion are cast aside, slavery was a key issue. Or, to put the answer in a different light, if there was no slavery in the US in 1860, there would never have been a civil war.
The Nat Turner Rebellion helped to cause the Civil War because it intensified efforts on both sides of the slavery issue. Southern slave holding states enacted stricter slave codes, and abolitionists intensified their efforts to end slavery. The Nat Turner Rebellion was one of the bloodiest slave revolts in United States history. Turner and a group of escaped slaves killed 55 white people before the rebels were captured.
The right of his troops to rob the Southern enemy of his chattels, which included slaves. This answer here is a little unjustified.The more appropriate answer to this is; that Lincoln freed the slaves that were in rebellion against the Union. He justified that he still supported Slavery, but with the rebellion in hand to protect the Union and confederacy. He did not intend for the troops to rob the places of the Southern.
Slavery in the southern colonies increased after the invention of the cotton gin. This invention made plantation agriculture extremely lucrative; slavery was abolished in 1865.
No. The southerns were the ones who started slavery where as the north prohibited it. The southern started slavery especially around the Civil War.
to end slavery
Civil War
Denmark Vessey
Slavery was a solution, it was a very inexpensive form of labor. And the South was cash starved.
southern slave owners said it was justified
Slavery
His rebellion was against slavery in Jamaica.
It can easily be said that when all the other reasons for the Southern rebellion are cast aside, slavery was a key issue. Or, to put the answer in a different light, if there was no slavery in the US in 1860, there would never have been a civil war.
J. D. B. De Bow has written: 'The southern states' -- subject(s): Economic conditions, Slavery 'The interest in slavery of the southern non-slaveholder' -- subject(s): Controversial literature, Secession, Slave labor, Slavery 'The Induttisal Resouces etc. Southern and Western States'
Amistad rebellion
Because they believed that the enslaved Africans were better off in plantations
The loss of slavery would threaten the Southern economy.