Want this question answered?
When Virginia and Kentucky in the late 1700s and South Carolina in the 1830s refused to follow federal law they were practicing nullification.
This doctrine taught that any state could nullify a law of the United States that was contrary to the Constitution as they understood it.
These declarations claimed that states have the right to consider void any act of Congress that they deem unconstitutional.
In order for Cecil Rhodes to gain control of Lo Bengula's riches, he had to trick him into signing a contract. The contract that Lo Bengula was signing was thought to say that Rhodes could dig for gold in exchange for a gift. Instead the contract said that Rhodes had full power to do things that "they may deem necessary" to produce a profit for England without payment to Lo Bengula.
The Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890 was the first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts or business activities that federal government regulators deem to be anticompetitive. It also requires the federal government to investigate and pursue trusts (monopolies).
The Doctrine of Nullification held that states had the right to declare null and void any federal law they deem unconstitutional.
Yes, to deem is to decide something is.
Nullification is the theory that states have the right to invalidate federal laws they deem unconstitutional. It is based on the belief that the states are sovereign entities with the power to challenge and reject laws imposed by the federal government. This principle was most notably debated during the early 19th century in the context of disputes over state vs. federal authority.
When Virginia and Kentucky in the late 1700s and South Carolina in the 1830s refused to follow federal law they were practicing nullification.
Nullification was the idea that states had the right to reject or nullify any federal law they deemed unconstitutional. This concept was put forth by proponents of states' rights as a way to limit the power of the federal government and protect the sovereignty of individual states. It was most notably argued during the Nullification Crisis in the 1830s over tariffs.
The issue of nullification refers to the concept that individual states have the right to invalidate or reject federal laws that they deem unconstitutional. This was a contentious debate in the United States during the early 19th century, particularly surrounding issues such as the tariff and slavery. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled that nullification was not legal and that federal law supersedes state law.
Both civil disobedience and nullification stem from the principle of states' rights. Civil disobedience involves individuals challenging unjust laws, while nullification allows states to reject or invalidate federal laws they deem unconstitutional. Both involve a form of resistance against perceived governmental overreach.
This doctrine taught that any state could nullify a law of the United States that was contrary to the Constitution as they understood it.
To deem something as worthlessThe right spelling is:Floccinaucinihilipilification
To deem small or little. To consider something to be small or little.
The prefix of "deem-phrase" is "deem-".
Unconstitutional