0.03 is a fractional number and there is no way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 0.
A whole number must be on the left of the decimal point - 1.00, 2.00, 3.00 and so on.
Therefore 0.03 is not a whole number.
0.03 can't be a whole number.
100
I don’t know
.0032 is greater than .003
The smaller the value the closer it is to zero..003 < .01, therefore .003 is closer to zero.On a number line (not to scale):---(0)--(.001)-(.002)-(.003)-(.004)-(.005)-(.006)-(.007)-(.008)-(.009)-(.010)-(.011)Notice how .003 is closer to 0 than .010
.003 is faster than .005
They both equal the same as long as there are no numbers before the zeroes.
005 is thicker than 003
Yes.
blob
Ra-1780 003 is it real
0.003% = 0.00003
14540-p13-003 has to be purchased directly from Honda.
.003
A mixed number is a whole number plus a fraction, so it has to be more than ' 1 '.0.03 is a little bit less than ' 1 ', so there's not enough there to make a whole number,and way too little to make a mixed number.
How much is a seth Thomas grandfather clock worth with number 4499-003
It can be a number of any magnitude; for example, 1,000,200,300,000,400,000,560,000.000 500 006 007 010 200 003 009 is one,1,000,200,300,000,400,000,560,000,000,500,006.007 010 200 003 009 is another.
.0032 is greater than .003
7.65=.003=7.653
The smaller the value the closer it is to zero..003 < .01, therefore .003 is closer to zero.On a number line (not to scale):---(0)--(.001)-(.002)-(.003)-(.004)-(.005)-(.006)-(.007)-(.008)-(.009)-(.010)-(.011)Notice how .003 is closer to 0 than .010