Want this question answered?
1/3(.3 repeated), 2/3(.6 repeated), 1/9(.1repeated), 2/9(.2 repeated), etc. There are billions of repeating decimals.
89 is an integer, not a fraction. The repeated decimal equivalents are 89.000....(repeating) or 88.999... (repeating).
A repeating decimal is usually shown with a bar over the decimal that is repeated
77.7 repeating is a decimal.
It is equal to two, just as 0.9999 repeated is equal to one. Here is a proof: 1/3=0.33333 repeating (1/3)*3=0.3333 repeating * 3 1=0.9999 repeating Now, adding one to both sides also means that 1.9999 repeating equals 2.
In rational form it is 17/15.
-0.5555 repeating -0.25 -0.125 0.1 0.16 0.2222 repeating 0.33
1/3(.3 repeated), 2/3(.6 repeated), 1/9(.1repeated), 2/9(.2 repeated), etc. There are billions of repeating decimals.
The answer is repeating
0.225 Repeated, 0.225, 0.25 Repeated and 0.25.
A pattern that is repeated constantly.
Turning repeating decimals to fractions are quite simple. All you need to do is take a look at what numbers are being repeated. For this question, as the 7 and the 2 are being repeated, we can see that there are only two numbers being repeated. So we put two 9's as the denominator for the fraction and 72 as the numerator. So a simple way to put this would be, however many numbers that are being repeated, that's how many 9's are needed for the denominator. Therefore, 0.72 repeating is 72/99 and simplified is 8/11.
89 is an integer, not a fraction. The repeated decimal equivalents are 89.000....(repeating) or 88.999... (repeating).
A repeating decimal is usually shown with a bar over the decimal that is repeated
77.7 repeating is a decimal.
a repeated rhythm idiot
Ones that are really long with exponents. Decimals can add difficulty if the number must be repeated vocally. The same goes for fractions. Ex) 1,794,427,931 would be tough because it is ling and has a wide variety of numbers.