0
What else can I help you with?
What do you call a person who do something a resonably prudent person would do?
A person who acts in a way that a reasonably prudent person would act is often referred to as a "prudent person" or "reasonable person." In legal contexts, this standard is used to evaluate behavior and determine negligence. Essentially, it describes someone who exercises good judgment and makes decisions based on common sense and careful consideration.
What is basic speed law?
No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions
What is is the basic speed law?
No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions
Is reasonable prudent nurse standard an objective standard?
It is subjective.
What appeal are the drafters of the declaration using when they say they are prudent and reasonable?
ethos
Is the failure to act as a reasonable prudent person would act under similar circumstances?
What helps determine that the voucher has supporting obligation documentations prior to certification
What appeals are the drafters of the declaration using when they say they are prudent and reasonable men?
ethos
What type of responsibility of a soldier to exercise reasonable and prudent?
This is direct responsibility. It is the job of all soldiers to be careful and do prudent actions in order to keep others safe.
Failure to do something that a reasonable person would do under ordinary circumstances that ends up causing harm to another person?
Negligence is when someone fails to take reasonable care or precautions that a prudent person would under similar circumstances, resulting in harm or injury to another individual. It involves a breach of a duty of care owed to the other person.
What type of responsibility obliges a soldier to exercises reasonable and prudent actions?
This is direct responsibility. It is the job of all soldiers to be careful and do prudent actions in order to keep others safe.
How is the standard of a duty of reasonable care determined?
The standard of a duty of reasonable care is determined based on what a hypothetical reasonable person would do in similar circumstances, taking into account factors such as the foreseeability of harm, the relationship between the parties, and the nature of the activity involved. Courts consider what actions would be considered reasonable and prudent under the specific circumstances of a case.
What is the legal basis for negligence?
Basically, a person is negligent when they fail to take the care a reasonable and prudent person would take in the same circumstances. In order to prove negligence, the plaintiff must show that the allegedly negligent party had an express or implied duty to the plaintiff or the public (such as a lifeguard's duty to remain awake and alert, or a retail store's duty to keep walkways and aisles clear), that the injury to the plaintiff was caused by the action or inaction of the defendant, and that the allegedly negligent action or inaction was not that expected of a reasonable, prudent person faced with the same circumstance.
