a remittance advice is a written confirmation of payment,otherwise known as a receipt or in the USA a check.
the person who is making the check.
This can be two things: 1. Originator of funds (i.e. the remitter), the person(s)/entity that initiated the funds transfer, and 2. Source of funds, implying what are the source of funds for the remittance, i.e. where is this money coming from.
The Remitter has to provide the following details:Amount to be remittedAccount number which is to be debitedName of the beneficiary bankName of the beneficiaryAccount number of the beneficiaryRemarks or description, if anyThe IFSC code of the beneficiary branch
Remittance processors are like payment service providers. Their end goal is to process or channelize payments. This can be done in three way: Straight Through Processing, Remitter Processing or Beneficiary Processing. They essentially take payments in or out (via cash or cheque, credit/debit card, direct bank deposit) etc and process the remittance payments.
MT103/23 "Field 23 - Instruction Code" is where the remitting bank (at the request of the remitter) puts in a simple code instructing the beneficiary's bank how to effect the payment, such as "Credit Account under Advice", "Telephone beneficiary on receipt", "Pay against passport" and such like. MT103 is a straight-through processing mechanism requiring very little manual intervention, except in simple tasks like above. You cannot send an MT103 with a condition that the beneficiary's bank must receive, say certain documents, from the beneficiary before crediting his account. Such a request will be rejected by the remitting bank, and if sent in Field 23 (which allows for only a few standard codes) will be rejected and ignored by the beneficiary's bank who will credit the beneficiary's account anyway. Transactions that involve the exchange of money for documents are documentary collections (D/A, D/P etc.) and are processed in other ways. Banks are banks, they are not lawyers or trust companies.
A remitter is the person who sends the money order
It is possible but does depend upon the policies of the issuing bank. The check can be negotiated by the remitter, however, the remitter's bank may not allow them to exchange the check for cash - they may require it be deposited bank into the remitter's account. The remitter would have access to the funds per that bank's funds availability policy, but no later than the next day in most cases.
No
the person making the payment
the person who is making the check.
It depends on destination and remitter.
This can be two things: 1. Originator of funds (i.e. the remitter), the person(s)/entity that initiated the funds transfer, and 2. Source of funds, implying what are the source of funds for the remittance, i.e. where is this money coming from.
The Remitter has to provide the following details:Amount to be remittedAccount number which is to be debitedName of the beneficiary bankName of the beneficiaryAccount number of the beneficiaryRemarks or description, if anyThe IFSC code of the beneficiary branch
The short answer is No. However, if the original payee signs the check over to you by endorsing the back your Financial Institution may negotiate the check as 2nd party. Besides that you must have the check re-issued by the remitter (the person who wrote the check).
Remittance in transit refers to a cross-border money transfer that is still in progress within the banking channel. The remitter's funds are snaking its way across to the beneficiary, and whilst it is in progress, the remittance (money transfer) is called or cited as remittance in transit.
If it is made payable to you, yes. If you are the remitter (purchaser - person paying with the check), no.
Pettiest, prettied, prettier, puttered, remitted, remitter, resettle and rebutted are 8 letter words with 2 e's and 2 t's. Additional words include refitted, roulette, unfetter, unsettle and vendetta,