A centralized empire is a vast empire that has a single base power and several colonies. A strong example of this is the British empire. The British empire was ruled by the British parliament and Queen of England, however it had several colonies that made up the empire.
The Roman Empire developed a strong centralised state when Augustus, the first emperor, established his own personal ruler and started the period of absolute rule by emperors. The emperors had control over the state and politics, which ensured centralised power.
The decline of the Mongol Empire was significantly triggered by the death of Genghis Khan in 1227, which led to a fragmentation of the empire among his descendants. Subsequent power struggles and infighting weakened centralized control, and the empire struggled to manage its vast territories. Additionally, the rise of regional powers and the inability to adapt to changing political and economic landscapes further accelerated its decline. Ultimately, the empire fractured into several khanates that gradually lost cohesion and influence.
The culture differences among the khanates in the Mongol Empire eventually led to the fragmentation and weakening of the empire. Each khanate developed its own distinct cultural practices, languages, and administrative systems, which made it difficult to maintain centralized control. This lack of unity and coordination among the khanates made it challenging to effectively govern the vast territories of the empire, contributing to its eventual decline and disintegration.
Charlemagne had a significant impact on Europe. He expanded the Frankish Empire, promoting the Carolingian Renaissance, which led to cultural and intellectual flourishing. He also implemented administrative and legal reforms, centralized governance, and supported the growth of Christianity, thus influencing the formation of feudalism and setting the stage for the development of modern European nations.
Charlemagne was crucial for uniting much of Western Europe during the early Middle Ages, laying the groundwork for the future nations of France and Germany. His promotion of education, culture, and Christianity spurred the Carolingian Renaissance, which preserved classical knowledge and influenced European development. Despite the eventual collapse of his empire, his legacy lived on through the establishment of a centralized authority and the concept of a Christian empire, shaping European identity and politics for centuries to come.
yes he used a strong centralized government to run his empire~ i hope did helped you...:)
Both Mauryan and Gupta had strong centralized governments.
Chandragupta set up a strong centralized government for his empire. This included a strong army, an internal intelligence system, and a postal service.
Chandragupta set up a strong centralized government for his empire. This included a strong army, an internal intelligence system, and a postal service.
Ottoman centralized government with universal access to centralized authority. It was available to each citizen of the Empire.
lacked a strong centralized government
some were taxation, the code of hammurabi, the war chariots, and centralized governments
yes he used a strong centralized government to run his empire~ i hope did helped you...:) ---answered by: esther.shinee7
The Ottoman Empire had a strong central authority but allowed distant provinces to have a high-level of autonomy on internal affairs.
In the more centralized core of the empire, near Rome, the public health standard was much higher than in the outer shell and front lines.
Brazil passed from centralized empire to federal republic by coup d'etat in November, 1889.
Some differences include: the Mauryan empire... - strong, centralized government to control their empire and crush resistance to their ruling. - emperor owned all land - focused on the spread of Buddhism The Gupta empire... - not as centralized in government - divided the main lands into units as royal officials governed each one - made Hinduism India's main religion