0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Would the melting of permafrost cause a runaway greenhouse effect?
It's possible. Yes. Permafrost is essentially frozen peaty deposits in many of the arctic regions of the world. As the organics have slowly decomposed over thousands of years under anaerobic conditions they have released methane gas which has been trapped in the ice and organic fiber matrix of the permafrost materials. Melting permafrost releases this methane which is a potent greenhouse gas. The feedback of global warming causing the melting and the melting releasing methane to enhance the warming effect creates a greater and growing problem.
Why could the melting of permafrost cause a runaway greenhouse?
It is thought that a vast amount of carbon dioxide is held imprisoned within the permafrost. If the permafrost was to melt, the carbon dioxide released would add considerably to the greenhouse affect.
How can an overall melting of a permafrost result in a runaway greenhouse effect?
The permafrost contains vast amounts of frozen methane (CH4), a powerful greenhouse gas. An overall melting of the permafrost will release this methane. This huge extra amount of methane in the atmosphere will immediately trap more heat. This new heat will melt more tundra and glaciers, beginning a dangerous cycle that could cause a runaway greenhouse effect. This would mean the end of all life on earth.
Can you find permafrost in the taiga?
No, permafrost is found in the tundra.
Can you use he word permafrost in a sentence?
Yes, you can use permafrost in a sentence. Example:Another word for cubed ice is "permafrost".
Would the melting of permafrost cause a runaway greenhouse effect?
It's possible. Yes. Permafrost is essentially frozen peaty deposits in many of the arctic regions of the world. As the organics have slowly decomposed over thousands of years under anaerobic conditions they have released methane gas which has been trapped in the ice and organic fiber matrix of the permafrost materials. Melting permafrost releases this methane which is a potent greenhouse gas. The feedback of global warming causing the melting and the melting releasing methane to enhance the warming effect creates a greater and growing problem.
How and why is melting of permafrost dangerous?
Permafrost, when it melts, releases vast amounts of methane (CH4), a powerful greenhouse gas, produced from the anaerobic rotting of the permafrost vegetation. This increases global warming, which is causing climate change.
Why could the melting of permafrost cause a runaway greenhouse?
It is thought that a vast amount of carbon dioxide is held imprisoned within the permafrost. If the permafrost was to melt, the carbon dioxide released would add considerably to the greenhouse affect.
Destruction of tundra vegetation will likey result in?
In the northern part of the tundra the vegetation has little influence on permafrost. The destruction of the vegetation accelerates thawing only slightly.
How does permafrost melting affect global warming?
potentially all vegatable matter currently locked in permafrost may begin to decompose and release huge amounts of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.
How can an overall melting of a permafrost result in a runaway greenhouse effect?
The permafrost contains vast amounts of frozen methane (CH4), a powerful greenhouse gas. An overall melting of the permafrost will release this methane. This huge extra amount of methane in the atmosphere will immediately trap more heat. This new heat will melt more tundra and glaciers, beginning a dangerous cycle that could cause a runaway greenhouse effect. This would mean the end of all life on earth.
How do you stop permafrost melting?
Put it in your freezer. because it cannot stay outside and not melt unless the temp. stays under 0 degrees Celsius.
What is salt solution melting point?
Over 9000
What are the two terms of solution?
dissolving and melting point
Is statistics a solution of your problem or means to indicate problem?
It is a solution.
Which is correct usage - solution for or solution to?
Both "solution for" and "solution to" can be used, but they are used in slightly different contexts. "Solution for" is used when referring to a specific problem or situation that needs a resolution, while "solution to" is used when indicating the answer or resolution to a problem or situation. For example, "We need to find a solution for the traffic congestion" or "We found a solution to the math problem."
Is a solution just a solution?
A solution is the answer to a problem. For example, in a math problem a solution is this: 5w=25 w= 5
