There are two kinds of arrest warrants: "straight" warrants, which are issued as a result of a criminal complaint or indictment, and "default" warrants, which are issued because a person defaults on their responsibility to either appear in court or pay a court-mandated fine.
From http://www.mass.gov/legis/senate/warrant.htm
A default warrant is a criminal arrest warrant like any other, even if the original offense was minor, the default on the court appearance is a serious issue. Like for any other arrest warrant, all states will arrest you on it and contact Massachusetts (or whatever state issued the warrant) for extradition. You will need to work with a criminal attorney in Massachusetts to cure the default.
He'll be extradited to the state with the warrant and prosecuted there.
No waiting: they can go straight to a judge and have a warrant issued.
There is no statutes of limitations on a felony possession drug warrant. It forever stays active.
The straight-line distance is 856.2 miles. This is the true straight line distance which accounts for the curvature of the earth, NOT the straight line drawn on a map.
The straight edge movement had a vague begining. The term straight edge was born in Washington D.C., but there were other members of the group around the country.
The phone number of the Straight Ahead Pictures Inc is: 413-369-4372.
The address of the Straight Ahead Pictures Inc is: Po Box 395, Conway, MA 01341-0395
PT warrant is a warrant issued for production of an Accused. P.T. warrant means Prisoner's Transit Warrant.
Generally no. Usually police officers have specific jurisdictions where they make arrests. Some states give police, or peace officers jurisdiction to arrest in the entire state. Only Federal law enforcement officers can arrest in any state, but only for Federal law violations. When a Boston police officer needs a person arrested in Atlanta, for example, they obtain a warrant for the suspect's arrest, place the warrant on NCIC (National Crime Information Computer) and tell Atlanta to pick the suspect up on the warrant. Once the suspect has been arrested in Atlanta, the Boston Police must forward complete copies of the warrant and the affidavit used to obtain the warrant to Atlanta. The suspect may then fight extradition to Massachusetts to avoid the Massachusetts Courts. Suspects rarely win extradition fights.
The straight-line distance between Boston, MA and Concord, MA is about 16 miles (26 km). The road distance is up to 24 miles (39 km).
The 1987 Supreme Court case that supported the use of evidence obtained with a search warrant that was inaccurate in its specifics is Massachusetts v. Sheppard. In this case, the court ruled that as long as the police officers acted in good faith reliance on the warrant, the evidence could still be used against the defendant.