it is probably a gas
The object accelerates.
Answer: weight and inertia
The answer is 79.832 kg (approx.). Kilogram is the SI unit of mass and pound is an imperial unit of mass. To convert from pound to kg, multiply the pound unit by 0.453592."kg" is a unit of mass, not weight.-- An object that weighs 176 lbs on Earth has 79.83 kg of mass.-- An object that weighs 176 pounds on the Moon has 482.94 kg of mass.-- An object that weighs 176 pounds on Jupiter has 30.13 kg of mass.This is why it's so important for us all to finally learn the difference betweenmass and weight, now, at this point in history. Now that the 'space age' isin full bloom, it has become more and more common to hear and read aboutfamiliar objects located in other places, not on Earth.As long as everything in our total experience was always taking place on Earth,we could get away with the sloppy habit of saying that 1 kilogram of mass hasthe 'weight' of one kilogram ... because until now, that weight always feltthe same.But from now on, whenever that kilogram of mass leaves Earth and goesto be used in some other place, we could be stuck with the inconvenientand confusing fact that 1 kilogram might 'weigh' a lot more or a lot less than1 kilogram.It seems to me that it would be a lot less confusing to learn the simple differencebetween mass and weight.
Inertia is dependent on the mass of the object being considered, and sometimes by its momentum - depending on how we are using the term. Recall that inertia is the resistance of a body to a change in motion. (A body at rest tends to remain at rest unless acted on by an outside force. And, a body in motion tends to remain in motion unless acted on by an outside force.) We think of something massive as resistive to being moved. That's inertia. But it's not moving. If that same massive body is rolling, it will have a lot of momentum, and it will take a great deal of force to slow and stop it. In the first case, the object has no velocity, and will have no momentum. In the second case, it's moving, and it will have momentum.
move like jagger
well if it has little mass it has little weight and if you have a lot of mass the possibility of it would be that it weights a lot
not necessarily, due to wind resistance and the surface area of said object the object will not always fall as fast. ex. a human sky diving. if they are in a pencil dive, they will fall a lot faster then if they are in a spread eagle position. but due to its mass it will sure as hell hurt a lot. so yes and no
Such an object makes a larger dent in the fabric of space-time than an object with little mass. (It has a greater gravitational attraction than less massive objects)A greater force is required to accelerate such an object than a less massive object
No. An object that has a lot of mass and is hard to move has inertia.
The object accelerates.
Answer: weight and inertia
Volume x density = Mass A material with high density has a great mass for a small volume.
Yes, mass is the amount of matter in an object.
Mass is a measure of the amount of matter in an object. The more mass, the more matter. The Brooklyn Bridge is quite massive - has a lot of mass, whilst a feather has slight mass.
well if it has little mass it has little weight and if you have a lot of mass the possibility of it would be that it weights a lot
The mass won't change noticeably. (Note that the weightwill chage quite a lot in this case.)The mass won't change noticeably. (Note that the weight will chage quite a lot in this case.)The mass won't change noticeably. (Note that the weight will chage quite a lot in this case.)The mass won't change noticeably. (Note that the weight will chage quite a lot in this case.)
well think of it like having a small object with little mass then a large object with a lot of mass. Hitting the big object takes more force to make it move and the little object does not take nearly as much force to make it move. i hope this helped!