Embryological development in animals displays the same set of nested hierarchies that is known from comparative morphology and genetics, and thus evidence for common descent.
Nota bene: this adherence to nested hierarchies is not to be confused with the 19th century hypothesis of ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny. Embryos do not go through evolutionary stages during their development, but they dodisplay atavistic developments that are consistent with phylogenies based on other sources.
Embryological development often produces atavistic features that aren't found in the adult form, but are found in more basal forms of the same lineage. An example of this is the pharyngeal arches found in embryological stages of human beings. At one stage, they are indistinguishable from the structures that form gill pouches in other animals - but in mammals, they develop into other structures. Another example is the hind limbs on whales: at some stage during the embryological development of a whale, the embryo forms hind leg limb buds, the same as embryos of the land-based animals from which it descended. Often, such buds are then reabsorbed. Many whales, however, retain some vestigial form of their hind leg bones.
But atavisms aren't the only or even the best example of evidence from embryology: each and every single developmental feature in embryology fits neatly in a pattern of nested hierarchies that permeates all of life at every level of observation. It is this pattern that gives us the definitive proof of common descent, and, more importantly, allows us to determine the lineage of an animal, and its place in the evolutionary tapestry of life.
direct evidence is the observation of evolution as it occurs. We have discovered novel genes conferring an advantage in an environment in which the ancestral population lacked those genes entirely. One example is flavobacterium that evolved nylonase enzymes. Antibiotic resistance is another example.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
how does adaptations give evidence for evolution?
The theory of evolution has many criticisms but none have proven evolution wrong. For example, some people argue that the bacterial flagellum is 'irreducibly complex' and therefore can not have evolved, even though the evidence shows that it not only could have, but has.
fossils
biochemical evidence anatomical evidence fossils vestigial structure embryological evidence
The fact that sheep insulin can be substituted for human insulin is an example of evidence of evolution based on comparative biochemistry. Insulin is a peptide hormone.
The strong evidence for the common ancestry of all vertebrates is THE SIMILARITY OF THEIR EMBRYOLOGICAL STAGES.
NO. take Darwin's theory of evolution for example. there is no real evidence, but it is accepted as fact by most in America today.
direct evidence is the observation of evolution as it occurs. We have discovered novel genes conferring an advantage in an environment in which the ancestral population lacked those genes entirely. One example is flavobacterium that evolved nylonase enzymes. Antibiotic resistance is another example.
There are thousands of instances of direct evidence of evolution. The most well-known example is that of Darwin's Finches. These finches were observed through fossil records to have changed over time to adapt to their environment.
Indirect evidence refers to information that requires some form of inference or interpretation to establish a connection to a particular fact or conclusion. It does not directly prove a point but rather provides clues or support for a theory or argument. Examples include circumstantial evidence or expert opinions.
Such similarities are taken to be evidence of common ancestry.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
The single most compelling line of evidence for common descent in biology is the fact that all life adheres to a pattern of differences and similarities that forms a set of nested hierarchies. The same pattern is found whether one studies life's behaviour, morphology, embryological development or genetics.As for natural selection, the strong physical evidence here is that the process can be directly observed.
Virtually everything about them, from their morphology to their embryological development to their behaviour to their genomes.
Rudimentary body parts, those that are smaller and simpler in structure than corresponding parts in the ancestral species, are called vestigial organs. They are usually degenerated or underdeveloped. Vestigial organs are the most common evidence.chacha(: