Want this question answered?
To establish credibility and authority on the topic
To establish credibility and authority on the topic
Gg
to establish credibility and authority on the topic
The bill of rights.
No, it is non-authority, so at the most it can be persuasive authority.
Yes, it is.
unbinding precedent
The term 'persuasive' can be used as an adjective, for example, 'that is a persuasive argument'. It can also be used as a noun, for example 'persuasiveness'.
true
To establish credibility and authority on the topic
The Bill of Rights.
Yes, statutes and case law are primary authority in the jurisdictions that they control. They are persuasive authority in foreign jurisdictions.
A secondary source? There are two kinds of authority that a lawyer can use in his argument in court. The first is binding or mandatory authority. This consists of all applicable statutes and precedential case law in the jurisdiction. For example, if the lawsuit is in California state court, the lawyer could use all California statutes as mandatory authority. Statutes from New York are not binding in California. Persuasive authority is pretty much everything else. A lawyer can try to use other state's laws, or law review articles, or restatements, or American law institute writings in his argument, but the judge doesn't have to listen to this.
To establish credibility and authority on the topic
There are many things that are not recommended for a persuasive speech. It is not recommended that you use works like think for example.
Gg