False causality is the fallacy that since two events have happened, one caused the other. In logical terms: A, B therefore A --> B.
Examples:
"I have cooked dinner". "The television is on". "Therefore, cooking dinner turns the television on".
"The number of pirates have been steadily decreasing, while the temperature of the earth has been slowly increasing. This is proof that pirates cool down the earth, hence global warming is a hoax."
An example of false causality would be, "Every time I wear my lucky socks, my team wins. Therefore, my lucky socks are causing my team to win." This is a false causality because wearing the socks and the team winning are not necessarily connected in a cause-and-effect relationship.
In a debate about the importance of funding education, bringing up a completely unrelated topic like climate change to divert attention from the main issue would be an example of the logical fallacy called a red herring.
An example of the ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks their opponent's character or traits rather than addressing the argument itself. For instance, saying someone's argument is wrong because they are unintelligent is an ad hominem attack.
An ad hominem is a type of fallacy where an argument is directed against a person's character rather than the content of their argument. It involves attacking the individual making the argument rather than addressing the points they are trying to make.
The logical fallacy based on popularity rather than evidence and reasoning is called argumentum ad populum, or the appeal to popularity. This fallacy suggests that something must be true or valid simply because many people believe it to be so.
An example of the red herring fallacy is when someone brings up a unrelated topic or issue to divert attention away from the main argument or point being discussed. For example, in a debate about climate change, bringing up the personal life of a scientist involved in the research to discredit their work would be a red herring fallacy.
An ad hominem is a type of fallacy where an argument is directed against a person's character rather than the content of their argument. It involves attacking the individual making the argument rather than addressing the points they are trying to make.
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
Logical fallacy
No. A mistake in reasoning is called a logical fallacy.
In a debate about the importance of funding education, bringing up a completely unrelated topic like climate change to divert attention from the main issue would be an example of the logical fallacy called a red herring.
An example of an ad hominem logical fallacy would be when someone attacks the character or traits of a person making an argument rather than addressing the actual argument itself. For instance, if participants in a debate call each other names or criticize personal attributes instead of focusing on the topic at hand, they are committing an ad hominem fallacy.
ad hominem
An attack ad hominem is when someone attacks the character or traits of an individual instead of addressing the argument they are making. For example, saying "You shouldn't listen to her advice on investing because she has a messy personal life" is an attack ad hominem.
Introducing irrelevant facts or arguments to distract from the subject under discussion is a type of logical fallacy called a red herring. This tactic is often employed to divert attention away from the main issue being debated in order to confuse or manipulate the audience.
During a debate about gun control, one person brings up the issue of mental health as a red herring. This diversion shifts the focus away from the main topic of gun control to mental health, which is a separate issue.
Equivalence fallacy Source: Ethics of the Information Age Fifth Edition Page 66
The fallacy of irrelevant reason is sometimes called the red herring fallacy. It involves diverting attention away from the main issue by introducing an irrelevant argument or point.