False causality is the fallacy that since two events have happened, one caused the other. In logical terms: A, B therefore A --> B.
Examples:
"I have cooked dinner". "The television is on". "Therefore, cooking dinner turns the television on".
"The number of pirates have been steadily decreasing, while the temperature of the earth has been slowly increasing. This is proof that pirates cool down the earth, hence global warming is a hoax."
In a debate about the importance of funding education, bringing up a completely unrelated topic like climate change to divert attention from the main issue would be an example of the logical fallacy called a red herring.
An example of the ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks their opponent's character or traits rather than addressing the argument itself. For instance, saying someone's argument is wrong because they are unintelligent is an ad hominem attack.
The logical fallacy of changing the subject in an argument is called a "red herring." It involves diverting attention away from the original issue being discussed by introducing a different topic that is not relevant to the argument at hand.
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
The logical fallacy based on popularity rather than evidence and reasoning is called argumentum ad populum, or the appeal to popularity. This fallacy suggests that something must be true or valid simply because many people believe it to be so.
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
Logical fallacy
No. A mistake in reasoning is called a logical fallacy.
In a debate about the importance of funding education, bringing up a completely unrelated topic like climate change to divert attention from the main issue would be an example of the logical fallacy called a red herring.
An example of the ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks their opponent's character or traits rather than addressing the argument itself. For instance, saying someone's argument is wrong because they are unintelligent is an ad hominem attack.
An ad hominem logical fallacy is an insult of a person making a point. If someone was making a point, and a person in opposition to that point called them a name as opposed to responding to their evidence, that would be an ad hominem.
The logical fallacy of changing the subject in an argument is called a "red herring." It involves diverting attention away from the original issue being discussed by introducing a different topic that is not relevant to the argument at hand.
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
ad hominem
The logical fallacy based on popularity rather than evidence and reasoning is called argumentum ad populum, or the appeal to popularity. This fallacy suggests that something must be true or valid simply because many people believe it to be so.
Introducing irrelevant facts or arguments to distract from the subject under discussion is a type of logical fallacy called a red herring. This tactic is often employed to divert attention away from the main issue being debated in order to confuse or manipulate the audience.
Equivalence fallacy Source: Ethics of the Information Age Fifth Edition Page 66