Want this question answered?
A government study written by education experts would be the most credible source for use in answering a research question.
Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.
There are several indicators that can determine how credible a source is, however, the one that sticks out the most is based upon factual information. When reviewing a source check to see if the information within is fact based. If you cannot find another source to back the information as fact, chances are this is not a reliable source to use.
why the saientific method more relible source own personal experience
biased :
textbook apexC: V.H.<3
No, maybe, no, no
When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable, it should be considered unreliable or questionable. It is important to verify information from credible sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.
Biography.com can be considered a reliable source for information about historical figures and well-known individuals. However, it's always a good idea to verify information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and objectivity.
Yes, eNotes is generally considered a reliable information source. They provide study guides, lesson plans, and expert answers on various academic subjects. However, as with any source, it is important to verify information and cross-reference with other reputable sources.
A government study written by education experts would be the most credible source for use in answering a research question.
No, ezinearticles.com is not considered a reliable source of information. It is an article directory where anyone can publish content, so the quality and accuracy of the information can vary widely. It is often better to rely on more reputable sources for accurate and trustworthy information.
a scientific paper is a reliable source of information - apex
How reliable is black adder as a source of information about the ww1 trenches?
is reputation an effecive indicator of a person's being a reliable source of information
Only experience can tell you that. A source whose information checks out when compared to reality (e.g. other sources) is usually reliable, while a source whose data turns out not to match reality would be considered unreliable.
Everybody knows, the most reliable source of information if the AnswersWiki of Answers.com. Or reading from goats intestines ...