Which best describes a limited monarchy?

Answer 1

A form of government called a limited Monarchy or as some may term it a constitutional monarchy, is a nation where the king or queen have real political power. However, for the sake of having a nation where citizens also have real political power, the powers of the monarch are limited by laws or more formally limited by a written constitution.

Answer 2

It depends who the Monarch is! as The Bible phrase has it- Kings Go Forth and under the pressures of wars or national emergency- the need to tightly hand on to power frequently goes towards absolute-not limited monarchy. The concept of a Constitutional monarchy theoretically divides the powers up between the ruling monarch, and the cabinet ministers- or privy council as it is called in Britain ( nothing to do with public, oh well)- and the Parliament. Sometimes you could have all these features and still be under-the-gun, or sword monarchism. Czarist Russia had a sort of parliament called the Duma. The Duma was the Lower house- lilke the Congress" house of representatiives, and the Presidium was like the senate. Most Presidium members were nobles or high officers of the Armed forces - The Communists changed the names- but accepted and retained the two-house concept in their Soviet form of Federalism.

Answer 3

Limited constitutional monarchy is a monarchy in which the powers of the rulers are limited to those granted under the laws of the nation and the constitution.

Answer 4

noob