A scientific theory or hypothesis must be able to make predictions that can be tested. It must be possible to design an experiment so that there is one outcome if the hypothesis is true and a different outcome if it is false. This is what is meant by saying that a hypothesis is testable or falsifiable. If such as experiment is carried out and the outcome is not as predicted then the hypothesis must be rejected and replaced by an alternative hypothesis - or a modified version.
A 'testable' hypothesis is one in which you are able to conduct experiments in able to prove right or wrong.
* something testable * have to have tools * dependent and independent variables * groups (control and experimental) * something "do-able"
In Karl Popper's terminology there must be a way to prove a hypothesis false. That is what it means when scientists say that a specific hypothesis is a "testable hypothesis".
A hypothesis must be two things; testable and falsifiable.
Yes. A hypothesis must be testable to become a theory.
Yes, a scientific hypothesis must be testable. For a hypothesis to be incorporated into a theory or turned into a law, it must be testable by experimentation or observation. If it is not testable, it remains only speculation.
A testable hypothesis is one which you can formulate an experiment around
the hypothesis must be testable, and must be falsifiable
a hypothesis must be testable
A hypothesis must be testable.
It must be possible to observe whether the hypothesis is true.